- Few Southeast students face suspension, expulsion for sexual assaults, campus paper finds (4/25/17)6
- Perryville family organizing bone-marrow drive Friday for ailing 6-year-old boy (4/26/17)
- Woman battered after smashing boyfriend's meth pipe against wall, police say (4/25/17)1
- Temptations bassist dies after Cape Girardeau show (4/26/17)2
- Event includes the first public tour of 200-year-old Elmwood Manor (4/23/17)3
- BBB warns Jackson man's online business might not be legit (4/24/17)
- Pilot House goes smoke-free (4/23/17)10
- State Supreme Court rules against congressman's mother in dog-kennel defamation case (4/27/17)1
- Strattman to step down as principal at St. Mary (4/28/17)1
- Cape couple turns their home into cozy, comfortable music venue (4/24/17)
Veteran benefits, defense shouldn't be party issues
To the editor:
House Resolution 303 would eliminate the law that forces disabled military retirees to forfeit a dollar of their retirement pay for every dollar they receive in Veterans Administration disability compensation. About 670,000 veterans have their income cut in this way. HR 303, which has 326 co-sponsors, has been referred to the House Veterans Affairs Subcommittee. The Republican leadership refuses to schedule a vote.
A petition to force a vote on HR 303 needs 218 supporters. As of June 19, there were 182 representatives who had signed the petition -- 181 Democrats and one Republican. Where do Missouri's representatives stand?
A recent debate in the House Appropriations Committee over reducing tax breaks for those making over $1 million a year to put $1 billion more into the 2004 military construction budget resulted in defeat by a 34-24 party-line vote. Why are such things as the defense of our country and veterans care such partisan subjects?
Poplar Bluff, Mo.