custom ad
NewsDecember 15, 2018

Southeast Missouri State University has a new university master plan, a comprehensive take on the physical campus, space usage, upcoming maintenance and longer-term goals. The last time Southeast had a comprehensive master plan completed, it was 1996, said Tim Rowbottom with The Lawrence Group...

Cheney Hall is seen Aug. 10, 2017, at Southeast Missouri State University in Cape Girardeau. A newly unveiled university master plan contains no recommendation for the long-vacant building.
Cheney Hall is seen Aug. 10, 2017, at Southeast Missouri State University in Cape Girardeau. A newly unveiled university master plan contains no recommendation for the long-vacant building.Southeast Missourian file

Southeast Missouri State University has a new university master plan, a comprehensive take on the physical campus, space usage, upcoming maintenance and longer-term goals.

The last time Southeast had a comprehensive master plan completed, it was 1996, said Tim Rowbottom with The Lawrence Group.

The firm created a new university master plan, unveiled Friday at the board of regents� regular meeting.

�Learning has changed a lot� since 1996, Rowbottom said, and he called the new plan �a long time coming� and �extremely comprehensive.�

The master plan was a 30-month process beginning in 2016, with more than 70 meetings held, Rowbottom said.

A survey of faculty, staff and students was conducted and the results compiled, then the consultant data was compiled.

Ultimately, an executive summary, goals and aspirations, recommendations and a cost review were delivered Friday to the regents and university president Carlos Vargas-Aburto.

At the meeting, Vargas said initially, the plan was called a �facilities master plan,� but he said this needed to be a �university master plan.�

That way, the student experience and academic offerings were considered in addition to the state of the physical campus, Vargas said.

The master plan broke down recommendations into one- to three-year recommendations, four- to five-year, and six- to 10-year recommendations.

The shorter-term recommendations would cost about $70.5 million, the longer-term $34 million, and the longest-range would be approximately $135.5 million, for a total value of $240 million, adjusted for inflation.

Rowbottom said this is a starting point.

�Where the money comes from is a real issue,� Vargas said, adding his sense is, deferred-maintenance funding for higher education institutions is not a high priority for the legislature.

Vice president for finance and administration Kathy Mangels agreed.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

Mangels said the facilities management staff, while thin, does a �phenomenal job,� but deferred maintenance will continue to be a challenge.

Mangels added, �We have a lot to think about, strategically.�

Rowbottom said the plan identified several buildings that will need repairs and upgrades in the coming years.

The one- to three-year recommendations included the recently-completed International Village, built out from the former Cottonwood Treatment Facility on North Sprigg Street; a full building renovation for the Art Building, Crisp Hall and Brandt Hall; and renovation work in Dempster Hall and Seabaugh Polytechnic to accommodate growing areas of study cybersecurity and the UAS, or drone, program.

But which facilities will get priority?

�These recommendations are recommendations,� Vargas said, adding the plan is going to evolve by necessity as deeper conversations are held about needs the university has now, and what the future holds for the institution.

For example, Cheney Hall has been vacant for a couple of years now, Rowbottom said, and noted it is not good as classroom or office space, but could be renovated for use as residence space.

But, Rowbottom said, Cheney Hall is �extremely challenging,� as it is a WPA-era building, built as part of the New Deal in the early 20th century.

�Cheney has historical significance. From a physical standpoint, it should be demolished,� Rowbottom said, but noted the plan includes no recommendation for the building.

Campuswide, space usage needs to be more efficient, Rowbottom said, noting the existing space in Cape Girardeau on the main and River campuses could accommodate another 32 percent of enrollment growth.

He suggested a centralized scheduling model be implemented to maximize classroom usage, noting it would need to be built into the culture of the campus in order for it to be widely accepted.

Another aspect of making better use of existing space will be bringing together physically the programs that were moved during the academic restructuring, Rowbottom said.

University wide, he said, addressing safety and security concerns is a priority, as are adding student collaboration spaces and parking.

mniederkorn@semissourian.com

(573) 388-3630

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!