custom ad
NewsDecember 11, 2015

ST. LOUIS -- The effort to keep the NFL in St. Louis cleared a major hurdle Thursday, when a committee of city aldermen approved a financing plan for a new $1 billion stadium. The Ways and Means Committee backed the plan by a 7-2 vote. The full Board of Aldermen is expected to take up the issue today, but a final vote isn't expected until next week -- ahead of a Dec. 30 deadline imposed by the NFL for the three cities whose teams want to move to Los Angeles...

By JIM SALTER ~ Associated Press
This  artist's rendering provided by HOK and 360 Architecture in January shows a proposed NFL stadium in St. Louis. (HOK and 360 Architecture via The St. Louis Post-Dispatch)
This artist's rendering provided by HOK and 360 Architecture in January shows a proposed NFL stadium in St. Louis. (HOK and 360 Architecture via The St. Louis Post-Dispatch)

ST. LOUIS -- The effort to keep the NFL in St. Louis cleared a major hurdle Thursday, when a committee of city aldermen approved a financing plan for a new $1 billion stadium.

The Ways and Means Committee backed the plan by a 7-2 vote.

The full Board of Aldermen is expected to take up the issue today, but a final vote isn't expected until next week -- ahead of a Dec. 30 deadline imposed by the NFL for the three cities whose teams want to move to Los Angeles.

Owners of the Rams, the San Diego Chargers and the Oakland Raiders all have proposed relocation, perhaps as early as next season.

The good news from city hall for St. Louis football fans perhaps was offset by skepticism from a key NFL executive.

In an interview Thursday with Bernie Miklasz on radio station WXOS-FM, NFL Executive Vice President Eric Grubman said the city "will fall short of having a compelling proposal that would attract the Rams."

Grubman said the proposed stadium will "cost more than is at the drawing board at the moment; the funding has declined, and new taxes are being proposed to the Rams."

David Peacock, co-chairman of the St. Louis stadium task force, said passage of the aldermen's committee measure was a "significant milestone."

He called Grubman's comments a negotiating tactic and noted NFL owners have the ultimate decision on which teams stay and which ones go.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

"We aren't too tied up about it," Peacock said. "We feel good about what we have and what we're going to be able to do."

The St. Louis proposal calls for the city to finance $150 million as part of the funding for a new stadium along the Mississippi River, near the Gateway Arch.

The NFL team would pay $250 million, the league would give the team a $200 million loan, and fan seat licenses would generate $160 million. The rest of the funding would come from the state, either through tax credits or bonds.

Peacock has said the goal is to retain the Rams or lure another team to St. Louis if owner Stan Kroenke gets his wish to relocate the franchise.

Kroenke is part of a group proposing a $1.8 billion stadium in suburban Los Angeles.

The use of public money has drawn opposition at the city and state level.

Last month, Republican Missouri House Speaker Todd Richardson sent Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon a list of 120 House members opposed to funding the stadium.

But supporters said the stadium will retain and create jobs and help revitalize a dilapidated area of the riverfront.

Task-force members said the stadium also could be used for soccer, potentially attracting a Major League Soccer team.

The Rams play in the Edward Jones Dome, which opened just 20 years ago and was built entirely with public money; however, it's considered outdated by NFL standards.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!