custom ad
NewsApril 23, 2006

KIEV, Ukraine -- Scientists trying to predict the long-term health effects of the Chernobyl explosion look to Hiroshima and Nagasaki for clues, but drawing parallels is difficult. Chernobyl released about 400 times more radiation than the U.S. atom bomb dropped over Hiroshima, according to radiation experts. But the death toll attributed to Chernobyl is far lower, around 50 according to the Chernobyl Forum, a group comprising several U.N. agencies; at least 140,000 died in Hiroshima...

MARA D. BELLABY ~ The Associated Press

KIEV, Ukraine -- Scientists trying to predict the long-term health effects of the Chernobyl explosion look to Hiroshima and Nagasaki for clues, but drawing parallels is difficult.

Chernobyl released about 400 times more radiation than the U.S. atom bomb dropped over Hiroshima, according to radiation experts. But the death toll attributed to Chernobyl is far lower, around 50 according to the Chernobyl Forum, a group comprising several U.N. agencies; at least 140,000 died in Hiroshima.

That's partly because atomic bombs deliver a huge burst of heat and energy that kills instantly, flattens buildings and sparks fires.

The bomb leveled some 90 percent of Hiroshima. In contrast, the Ukrainian city of Pripyat, where Chernobyl's workers lived, suffered no physical damage; residents slept through the explosion.

Pripyat is still so radioactive that it remains deserted 20 years after the blast. Nagasaki and Hiroshima are large, bustling cities.

"An atomic bomb ... bursts into an instantaneous flash of gamma radiation and neutrons that disperses and is then gone," said Dr. Burton Bennett, who has researched Chernobyl as part of the Chernobyl Forum and the atom bombings through the Japan-based Radiation Effects Research Foundation.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

"Once the energy has been absorbed, there is very little residual radioactivity," he said.

But despite the differences, Japan's experience offered some ominous indicators.

Leukemia cases among atomic bomb survivors in 1950-1990 spiked well above the usual incidence rate of the disease. The cases, however, largely occurred within the first 10 years. That suggests that with the passage of 20 years since the Chernobyl disaster, the threat may have passed, Bennett said.

Among Japanese survivors, only seven percent of other cancer deaths -- stomach, lung, breast, colon, for instance -- were found to be radiation-linked.

Bennett said those results have helped predict some of the health problems to expect from Chernobyl. But Chernobyl also presented its own problems. Since the doses were acquired over a longer period of time -- not instantaneously as in Hiroshima -- researchers had to take into account many other factors, such as diet and lifestyle, Bennett said.

The Chernobyl Forum predicts that among the 600,000 people who received higher radiation doses because of Chernobyl, an additional 4,000 radiation-related cancer deaths could be expected.

"Studies of the long-term effects in Japan have given us the best basis," Bennett said.

Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!