HOUSTON -- The first week of Arthur Andersen LLP's obstruction of justice trial featured verbal warfare, witnesses invoking the Fifth Amendment and the lyrics of an Andersen partner's Enron-inspired parody based on the Eagles' anthem "Hotel California."
The jurors hearing evidence on whether the firm intentionally shredded Enron documents to keep them out of the hands of the Securities and Exchange Commission also had heavy eyelids at esoteric testimony on the complicated accounting that fueled Enron's failure.
In the first criminal trial to emerge from the Enron scandal, prosecutors spent the first several days questioning SEC investigators about the agency's role in protecting investors and presenting evidence of Enron's influence over Andersen.
"What does this have to do with shredding documents?" Andersen's lawyer, Rusty Hardin, asked several times, soliciting exasperated responses from prosecutors.
Hardin had told jurors in his opening statement that the case reminded him of the game "Where's Waldo?" and continued that theme throughout the week, asking most witnesses "Are you Waldo?"
After pleas from prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, U.S. District Judge Melinda Harmon told Hardin to cut it out.
The jury missed two instances of open warfare between Hardin and prosecutors over a reluctant witness and Hardin's method of questioning.
Weissmann told the judge that Kate Agnew, a former Andersen manager on the Enron account, intended to invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Hardin said prosecutors only wanted to parade Agnew in court to show other witnesses that "they had better think long and hard about testifying" on the firm's behalf.
"You've given your opinion," the judge told Hardin before telling the prosecutor to call his witness.
Agnew entered the courtroom, invoked the Fifth and left.
Nancy Temple, an in-house Andersen lawyer at the firm's Chicago headquarters, invoked the Fifth by mail. Temple sent an e-mail on Oct. 12 to Andersen's Houston office reminding partners of the firm's document retention and destruction policy. She told Congress in January that she "never counseled any shredding or destruction of documents," but has remained silent since.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.