This week the Southeast Missourian asked, "What do you think of the court's decision to require secret service agents to testify in the Starr grand jury investigation of Bill Clinton?"
David Bleckler, Cape Girardeau
"As long as it doesn't interfere with national security I think they should have full disclosure."
Mark Gibson, Cape Girardeau
"I think the whole thing's a big crock. I think they ought to keep his personal affairs and government as two separate situations."
Rodney Reece, Cape Girardeau
"I think in the absence of constitutional protection they should be forced to testify. I think that the conduct of the president should be to the point that he should have no fear as to what his secret service agents would be revealing."
Chad Davidson, Cape Girardeau
"I think they should be allowed to testify. I think they should be forced to testify. They work for the president, they work for the government and he's not above the law. He's not above lying to the public and getting away with it."
Robert Deshazier, Cape Girardeau
"I say leave the president alone. Leave the man alone. The president's doing all right.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.