custom ad
NewsJuly 11, 2005

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- A new set of federal rules took effect last month, placing the onus for identifying, investigating and reporting allegations of scientific misconduct on universities and institutions. "This raises the stakes on academia itself to self regulate," said Washington D.C.-based lawyer David Bloch who works with medical manufacturers and trade groups...

The Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- A new set of federal rules took effect last month, placing the onus for identifying, investigating and reporting allegations of scientific misconduct on universities and institutions.

"This raises the stakes on academia itself to self regulate," said Washington D.C.-based lawyer David Bloch who works with medical manufacturers and trade groups.

In June, integrity officers from universities and institutions around the country gathered in Sacramento to learn about the new federal rules and talk about how to prevent -- and catch -- cheaters.

The new rules -- which affect about 4,000 universities and institutions that receive federal funds for medical research -- require a formal program to review research and maintain integrity. The rules define "research misconduct" as fabrication, falsification and plagiarism, excluding authorship disputes, honest errors or differences of opinion. A new six-year limit on investigating misconduct has also been added.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

"Research integrity is not just sitting back and waiting for something to happen anymore," said Larry Vanderhof, chancellor of University of California, Davis, which has taken a lead on dealing with research integrity. "We have to be very proactive now."

Federal law already encourages whistleblowers with substantial promises of reward money, and it outlines very clearly how institutions need to monitor and investigate misconduct.

The number of federal scientific misconduct cases "is likely to skyrocket" under the new law, both because of the new requirements and the financial benefits of whistleblowing, said lawyer Bloch.

"Whistleblowers can receive a significant portion of whatever is collected by the government, potentially, millions of dollars," he said. "There's a strong incentive there."

Many universities are appointing professors or administrators to administer the new required procedures, said David Wright, a professor at Michigan State University who studies scientific misconduct.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!