Netanyahu's legacy is on the line in Israeli election

JERUSALEM -- As Israelis prepare to vote in parliament elections on Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finds himself at a fateful crossroads: Make history or become history.

If Netanyahu can lead his Likud Party to victory and secure a fourth term in office, he will move closer to overtaking the nation's iconic founding father, David Ben-Gurion, as the longest-ever serving premier and cementing a status as the dominant Israeli politician of the past two decades.

But if Likud stumbles and finds itself in the opposition -- a real possibility, according to recent polls -- the Netanyahu era could end with a resounding thud, concluding a career many would say brought few major accomplishments beyond longevity.

Iran and the international community seem headed toward a nuclear deal Netanyahu abhors, and a resolution to the Palestinian issue seems as distant as ever.

"If he leaves office, he won't leave any dramatic changes," said Yoaz Hendel, a former aide to Netanyahu. In a turbulent region, one could say "this is the best thing to do," Hendel said.

The Israeli campaign is widely seen as a choice between two world views: Netanyahu's focus on Israel's many security challenges -- he has long been a voice calling for zero tolerance of terrorism -- or his opponents' focus on Israel's social problems and high cost of living.

It also touches on his support for Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, which the opposition and the outside world detest.

But on a basic level, the campaign is simply a referendum on Netanyahu, a polarizing character who is adored as "King Bibi" by his supporters and reviled by his detractors.

The son of a Jewish historian, and scarred by the loss of his brother in a 1976 Israeli commando raid on a hijacked airline in Uganda, Netanyahu often portrays himself -- and his country -- in historical terms.

He laces his speeches with references to Jewish history, tales of Jewish heroism and warnings Israel's most sinister enemies lurk around every corner.

The main target of his diatribes, Iran, often is compared to biblical enemies and even the Nazis.

"The days when the Jewish people remained passive in the face of genocidal enemies, those days are over," Netanyahu said in a controversial speech to the U.S. Congress earlier this month. "We are no longer scattered among the nations, powerless to defend ourselves."

It was vintage Netanyahu, delivered in flawless, American-accented English, developed during a childhood in Philadelphia and later as a university student at MIT, and with the gifted oratorical flourish that has made him prominent on the international stage.

His stern rhetorical style, often drawing comparisons to Churchill, has served him well during a three-decade career that has included time at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, as ambassador to the United Nations, a series of senior Cabinet posts and a stint as opposition leader. He has spent nine years as prime minister since 1996, and if he can keep the post through mid-2019, he will become the country's longest-serving premier.

But after enjoying a surge of popularity following last summer's war against Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip, Netanyahu is struggling.

Despite the speech to Congress, his efforts to halt the Iranian nuclear program -- which he describes as the mission of his lifetime -- appear to be stumbling as the U.S. seems to move toward a deal with the Islamic Republic.

The speech, delivered over White House objections, has worsened an already troubled relationship with President Barack Obama, boding poorly for the final two years of Obama's term if Netanyahu is re-elected.

Peace efforts with the Palestinians made no headway during the past six years, and Netanyahu has backtracked from his earlier support for a Palestinian state.

Yet he has not offered an alternative vision for resolving the festering conflict. Exasperated by years of deadlock and fighting, the Palestinians are preparing to file war-crimes charges against Israel after the election.

His opponents, meanwhile, have hammered his record on the economy, citing the widening gaps between rich and poor, and portrayed him as out of touch.