custom ad
NewsSeptember 13, 2017

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to maintain its restrictive policy on refugees. The justices Tuesday agreed to an administration request to block a lower-ourt ruling that would have eased the refugee ban and allowed up to 24,000 refugees to enter the country before the end of October...

By MARK SHERMAN ~ Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to maintain its restrictive policy on refugees.

The justices Tuesday agreed to an administration request to block a lower-ourt ruling that would have eased the refugee ban and allowed up to 24,000 refugees to enter the country before the end of October.

The order was not the court's last word on the travel policy President Donald Trump first rolled out in January. The justices are scheduled to hear arguments Oct. 10 on the legality of the bans on travelers from six mostly Muslim countries and refugees anywhere in the world.

It's unclear, though, what will be left for the court to decide. The 90-day travel ban lapses in late September, and the 120-day refugee ban will expire a month later.

The administration has not said whether it will seek to renew the bans, make them permanent or expand the ban to other countries.

Lower courts have ruled the bans violate the Constitution and federal immigration law. The high court has agreed to review those rulings. Its intervention so far has been to evaluate what parts of the policy can take effect in the meantime.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

The justices said in June the administration could not enforce the bans against people who have a "bona fide" relationship with people or entities in the United States. The justices declined to define the required relationships more precisely.

A panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district judge's order that would have allowed refugees to enter the United States if a resettlement agency in the U.S. had agreed to take them.

The administration objected, saying the relationship between refugees and resettlement agencies shouldn't count. The high court's unsigned, one-sentence order agreed with the administration for now.

The appeals court also upheld another part of the judge's ruling that applies to the ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Grandparents and cousins of people in the U.S. can't be excluded from the country under the travel ban, as the Trump administration had wanted.

The administration did not ask the Supreme Court to block that part of the ruling.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!