custom ad
NewsJanuary 24, 2019

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- The attorney for a former Missouri sheriff's deputy and correctional officer sentenced to death for a double killing told Missouri Supreme Court judges during Wednesday arguments his client should get a new trial because prosecutors bungled the case...

By SUMMER BALLENTINE ~ Associated Press

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- The attorney for a former Missouri sheriff's deputy and correctional officer sentenced to death for a double killing told Missouri Supreme Court judges during Wednesday arguments his client should get a new trial because prosecutors bungled the case.

Public defender Craig Johnston said during Marvin Rice's trial for the 2011 killing of his ex-girlfriend and her boyfriend, prosecutors repeatedly drew the jury's attention to the fact he didn't testify.

Johnston said that violated Rice's right against self-incrimination and said he deserves a new trial.

"Every time you turn around this experienced death penalty litigator is telling the jury this guy didn't testify," Johnston said in court.

Rice was convicted of the slaying of Annette Durham and her boyfriend, Steven Strotkamp, over a child custody dispute. In 2017, a judge sentenced Rice to death for Durham's killing and to life in prison over Strotkamp's death.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

At issue are multiple comments prosecutors made during Rice's trial about how he would have answered questions if he had testified.

"If he had been asked those questions he would have told us not only does he believe in the death penalty, he's willing to carry it out without the need for attorneys, judges, trial or jurors," assistant attorney general Kevin Zoellner said during the penalty phase of Rice's trial, according to court documents.

Assistant attorney general Nathan Aquino on Wednesday argued prosecutors didn't comment directly on Rice's failure to testify.

But judges appeared skeptical. Judge Laura Denvir Stith said prosecutors could have made their point without referring to Rice's silence. Judge Paul Wilson said instead, the prosecutor used "this weird roundabout reference" pointing out Rice didn't speak, and "that's what the Constitution prohibits."

Supreme Court judges focused less on Johnston's broader argument Rice was unconstitutionally sentenced to death by a judge and not a jury and therefore should get life in prison instead of execution.

A jury convicted Rice of first-degree murder for Durham's death and second-degree murder for Strotkamp's. But the jury couldn't decide whether Rice should be put to death, leaving it to the judge.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!