LOS ANGELES -- This has always been the anti-city, a sprawling circus with no center ring, known not so much for its downtown towers as for the rings around it -- including the San Fernando Valley, the vast suburbanesque tract that gave America the valley girl.
While the city south of the Hollywood hills attracted the wealthy, it is also flush with poverty and urban decay. By contrast, the valley is the 'burbs -- a paved platform for strip malls and ranch houses set along roads aligned to allow easy development.
Almost since it was created by downtown real estate speculators in 1915, the valley has struggled for its identity. State laws quashed two serious secession movements in the 1960s and '70s, but now a vote on valley secession is one bureaucratic step away.
A regional board overseeing secession will decide Wednesday whether to place the San Fernando Valley city proposal on the November ballot. Decisions on similar efforts by Hollywood -- the fabled heart of Los Angeles -- and the San Pedro community at the city's harbor will follow in early June.
A San Fernando Valley city, which some have proposed calling Camelot, would have about 1.3 million residents and compete with Phoenix to be the sixth largest in the country. It would be larger than Boston, Detroit and St. Louis.
If the movements are successful, the shrunken Los Angeles would become the nation's third-largest city, behind New York and Chicago.
"People in the San Fernando Valley do not feel like we're part of LA," said Theresa L. Cannon, who believes secession would bring lower taxes and better services.
But valley resident Leslie Lee thinks a new city would have trouble duplicating current services.
"We're too big to spin off, and we're not totally prepared," she said.
Secession supporters say the city is too large and too unresponsive.
Even anti-secessionists acknowledge that the valley -- home of 33 percent of the city's population and 50 percent of its land -- has fewer police officers, fewer libraries, parks and bus and mass transit lines than the communities on the south side of the mountains.
Mayor James Hahn and the city's political and business leaders plan to raise $5 million to convince valley voters that divorce is not the right decision.
Hahn has been making at least one appearance a week at valley events, and says city officials have changed.
Hahn, who took office last summer, has encouraged neighborhood councils to give residents more direct access to city government, put valley leaders on key city committees and promised better transit, waste disposal and police protection.
Like many divorce battles, this one is about money, assets and identity. Police and fire stations, parks, civic buildings and other infrastructure, even the Hollywood sign are potentially up for grabs.
"Any time you go through a divorce, both sides end up with less," Hahn regularly warns his audiences.
Jeff Brain, a commercial leasing agent who has spearheaded the valley's secession movement, counters by saying the valley would pay the remaining city of Los Angeles $55 million a year for 20 years in what amounts to municipal alimony. The board overseeing secession considers the money reimbursement for lost revenues to the city, as required under state law.
Brain tells residents in communities that will remain in Los Angeles that secession will bring them a smaller, more efficient city.
"Valley secession won't cost you a thing," Brain said.
What promises to be a bitter campaign should do nothing to improve the image of a city famous for renegade cops, urban riots and the O.J. Simpson trial.
"It raises the questions: 'Is the place so bad that people have to leave? Is there no other way to solve problems than a divorce?"' said Doug Peterson, a senior policy analyst with the National League of Cities.
Nationally, urban affairs experts warn other cities not to be too smug. Los Angeles has exported everything from skateboards to facelifts, and secession could follow.
"Every city has some neighborhood that doesn't feel loved. And every one of those cities will be looking with interest at what LA is doing," said George Thomas, an urban affairs professor at the University of Pennsylvania.
State laws around the country make secession virtually impossible. But with California opening up to secession, other states could follow, Thomas said.
Breaking up won't be easy. Under California law, a majority of voters in the breakaway areas, along with a majority of voters citywide, must approve secession. Recent polls show 59 percent of valley voters in favor of secession. Citywide, the support for secession has grown to near 49 percent, polls show.
With campaign kickoffs still a month away, many voters, like valley resident Arnold Snyder, are taking a laid-back approach.
"I'm going to go with the flow," said Snyder. "It's going to always be LA. I don't care what you call it."
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.