custom ad
NewsSeptember 25, 2014

NEW ORLEANS -- BP wanted its money back -- hundreds of millions of dollars of it -- but a federal judge said Wednesday the oil giant must stick by its agreement with the companies it compensated for business losses due to the 2010 Gulf oil spill...

By JANET MCCONNAUGHEY ~ Associated Press
Oil can be seen in the Gulf of Mexico more than 50 miles southeast of Venice on Louisiana's tip as a large plume of smoke rises from fires on BP's Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig in April 2010. The oil giant argued Wednesday before a judge that a funding formula in a settlement the company agreed to after the oil spill is giving money to businesses for questionable claims. (Gerald Herbert ~ Associated Press)
Oil can be seen in the Gulf of Mexico more than 50 miles southeast of Venice on Louisiana's tip as a large plume of smoke rises from fires on BP's Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig in April 2010. The oil giant argued Wednesday before a judge that a funding formula in a settlement the company agreed to after the oil spill is giving money to businesses for questionable claims. (Gerald Herbert ~ Associated Press)

NEW ORLEANS -- BP wanted its money back -- hundreds of millions of dollars of it -- but a federal judge said Wednesday the oil giant must stick by its agreement with the companies it compensated for business losses due to the 2010 Gulf oil spill.

BP argued a flawed funding formula in their settlement with alleged victims of the spill enabled many businesses to collect on questionable claims, and that they should be forced to return the money.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier agreed several weeks ago to change the formula for any future payments, but he ruled Wednesday a deal is a deal when it comes to the money BP has paid out.

Under that deal, claimants agreed not to sue the oil company, and BP company agreed no future court action could change their payments.

The ruling thwarts BP's latest attempt to control its soaring liability from the spill, which may be nearing $50 billion.

Barbier said he would rule later on the issue of compensation for cleanup workers whose chronic medical problems weren't diagnosed until after the deal's cutoff date of April 16, 2012. The settlement entitled cleanup workers with chronic conditions including rashes and breathing problems to receive up to $60,700 if the problems first surfaced within days of their cleanup work.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

Barbier ruled in July, as BP contends, those payments only can go to people diagnosed before that date, and any plaintiffs diagnosed later must prove in court their illness was linked to their spill work. Plaintiffs' attorneys asked him to change his mind, arguing the cutoff date would keep most of the affected workers from collecting. Many of these workers couldn't afford to pay doctors right away, and neither patients nor doctors knew what medical tests were required before the settlement was signed, they argued.

The plaintiffs' attorneys said the cutoff date was meant for people with "diseases, such as cancers, that would likely take years to manifest."

BP still is facing a financial nightmare from the nation's worst oil disaster, which began with an explosion that tore open the oil company's Macondo well on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico, destroying the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and killing 11 workers.

Just as the company struggled to contain the spill over the following weeks and months, it now is trying to contain its estimated liability. The London-based company told shareholders at one point its total exposure would be $40 billion, and markets responded accordingly.

The estimate now is close to $50 billion, including more than $27 billion that BP says it has paid to settle damage claims, and the company's stock price has suffered.

The Macondo explosion fouled fruitful seafood grounds, sensitive coastal marshes and tourist-friendly beaches.

The claims settlement reached with a committee of attorneys for various plaintiffs in 2012 had no cap, and its cost continues to rise.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!