custom ad
SportsJuly 29, 2008

INDIANAPOLIS -- Yes, the race at Indianapolis Motor Speedway was a debacle. No point in denying it. But don't be so quick to castigate NASCAR, which was faced with the unenviable task of trying to salvage a race that was destined to look like stalled, rush-hour traffic...

By JENNA FRYER ~ The Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS -- Yes, the race at Indianapolis Motor Speedway was a debacle. No point in denying it.

But don't be so quick to castigate NASCAR, which was faced with the unenviable task of trying to salvage a race that was destined to look like stalled, rush-hour traffic.

When it became obvious in Saturday's practice sessions that the tires Goodyear brought to Indy had a serious durability issue, there was only one option for NASCAR a day ahead of the green flag -- figure out how to stage a safe race.

Option No. 2? There wasn't one.

Formula One and Michelin learned that at Indy in 2005, when three-fourths of the field refused to compete in the United States Grand Prix because of tire concerns. Indy took a hit, the race never recovered and F1 currently isn't racing in this country.

"The difference between NASCAR and Formula One is Formula One thinks of it as a business -- they don't think about the fans, they don't think about the show," said Juan Pablo Montoya, the only driver to participate in both tire fiascos.

"Here they do. NASCAR will do whatever is possible to put the show on in the best way possible."

And that's exactly what NASCAR tried to do, relying heavily on deliberate caution flags that slowed the pace of the 400-mile race and forced teams to change tires every 10 to 12 laps. It meant a record 52 of the 160 laps ran under caution, with the longest green-flag run a mere 13 laps.

The victor Sunday was decided by one final heat race, a seven-lap sprint to the finish that saw Jimmie Johnson win the race off pit road then hold off Carl Edwards and Denny Hamlin to grab his second Brickyard title in three years.

To call it horrible racing is an understatement, and the participating drivers didn't mince words.

"It's embarrassing and it's disappointing. I've never seen anything like this," four-time Indianapolis winner Jeff Gordon said.

"Didn't see much of a race," Matt Kenseth echoed.

"It's just unacceptable at this level," Brian Vickers offered.

But their ire wasn't aimed square at NASCAR. Across the board, everyone understood NASCAR did the best it could with what it had to work with.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

Goodyear tested the tires it brought to Indy back in April, when Vickers, Dale Earnhardt Jr. and Kurt Busch experimented with several different compounds to help the tiremaker find a match for Sunday. Although the tires in that two-day stretch seemed to last somewhere around 15 laps a run, Goodyear wrongly believed their durability would improve once the full field took to the track and began laying rubber on Indy's abrasive surface.

Where Goodyear went wrong was underestimating the effect of NASCAR's current car, a heavier new model that puts a ton more stress on right-side tires than last year's car.

The tires at Indy couldn't hold up to the pressure, and the rubber Goodyear had assumed would stick to the track never happened. Instead, the surface became the equivalent of a cheese grater, turning the rubber into a dust that never settled onto the surface.

With tires worn down to their cords, failures almost were certain every 10 laps.

So NASCAR stepped in with competition cautions, which didn't give teams a chance to push their tires to the limit. Given the opportunity, teams certainly would have raced through the durability window -- a situation that likely would have created multiple tire failures and many wrecks.

It was a decision based on experience. Durability issues at Lowe's Motor Speedway in 2005 produced record cautions and dangerous racing conditions, when tires began popping like balloons. All NASCAR could do to stop it was a mid-race mandate on air pressures.

"Hindsight is 20/20," said vice president of competition Robin Pemberton, who patrolled pit road during the race so he could examine the tires up close and help the officials in the tower decide how to proceed.

Using a different tire wasn't an option, either. Although Goodyear shipped in an emergency allotment of tires it had earmarked for this weekend's race in Pocono, at least one manufacturer ran a simulation on that compound and determined the reserve tires would have been a dangerous 2 seconds faster per lap than the Indy tires. It would have created a major speed change not adaptable to the gear ratios and rev limits programmed for Indy.

NASCAR doesn't get a total pass on the Indy debacle.

The sanctioning body whiffed in failing to hold an open test session at the track, something that consistently has been done in past years.

Once the tires started failing during the test, and Goodyear saw the tires weren't laying any rubber on the track, there's no chance the company would have brought the same compound to Sunday's race.

Without the luxury of a full test, Goodyear had to guess a bit in preparing for Indy. Sometimes you guess right, and sometimes you guess wrong. In this case, Goodyear clearly was wrong.

As the only tire supplier in NASCAR, the company is not subjected to competition from other makers. Goodyear has the NASCAR market cornered, and every team needs its tires to turn even one lap. Its position as the only player in the game means it's even more important that Goodyear avoids the blunders it made coming into Indy.

It's not NASCAR's fault Goodyear wasn't prepared, and top officials did the best they could to salvage a dangerous situation. Now it's up to them to make sure it never happens again.

Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!