Another major title would bolster Roddick's status

WIMBLEDON, England -- Andy Roddick has what it takes to be a transcendent tennis star.

He boasts a record-breaking, highlight-reel-worthy 150 mph serve that makes opponents whiff and spectators gasp. He backs that up with a ferocious forehand, while the rest of his game is steadily improving under Brad Gilbert's tutelage.

It helps that he plays with a Connors-esque energy that can lead to high-fiving fans after a fantastic point. He even has a potential career-long foil: No. 1 Roger Federer.

And unlike 12 months ago at Wimbledon, where play starts Monday, Roddick now possesses something essential to consistently contending at Grand Slam tournaments: a Grand Slam title, earned in September at the U.S. Open.

"I was playing really well at Wimbledon last year, but maybe I didn't have the belief that I have now. Now having won one, that is definitely an advantage for me," Roddick said. "I'd always talked about, before I'd won a Grand Slam, that the only fear is the fear of the unknown. People would ask 'Can you win a Slam?' and I would say 'I'll let you know' -- and that's a big difference."

It's also a big reason why, despite all the apparent depth in tennis (something also interpreted as a lack of top talent), no one would be surprised if Roddick and defending champion Federer square off July 4 for the championship at the All England Club.

A changing of the guard could be in the offing. With Andre Agassi out, citing a hip injury, it's the first time in 16 years neither he nor the retired Pete Sampras is entered.

"I'm disappointed that Andre isn't able to post at Wimbledon this year. I know how much it means to fans to have him on court, and I hope he's able to play soon," Roddick said. "There will be a lot of action for fans to keep up with, since the rest of us will be giving it all we've got to try and win the tournament."

That, of course, includes Federer, on a 17-match grass-court winning streak and one of just three past champions in the men's field. The others are Lleyton Hewitt (2002) and Goran Ivanisevic (2001), who hasn't played here since collecting his lone major title and is retiring after the fortnight.

Rivalries drive popularity. How about Roddick-Federer?

It's not a done deal that they'll meet in the Wimbledon final, naturally. A group of players could intervene, including Tim Henman, who will reprise his role as the Great British Hope for the locals' first male champion since 1936.

Federer won a Grand Slam event earlier this year -- the Australian Open -- and has a tour-high five titles in 2004.

"I feel like there are not many guys left who really have an edge on me," says Federer, 5-1 against Roddick.

If Roddick, 21, is power and brashness, Federer, 22, is versatility and cool. Roddick's only loss in 16 grass matches was to Federer in the 2003 Wimbledon semifinals.

"I see Federer becoming more and more the Borg of the 2000s, with his game and style," said Dick Enberg, who first called Wimbledon on TV 25 years ago. "I don't see him going away for a while.

"Roddick gets it," Enberg added. "What I like about him, at his age, is he understands the responsibility of making that connection with the audience."

The Williams sisters remain the sport's most marketable stars, its biggest attractions on and off court. But beset by injuries, they haven't been at their best in a year -- since Serena beat Venus in the Wimbledon final.

Both lost in the French Open quarterfinals, the first time they were bounced in the same round of any tournament.

With top-ranked Justine Henin-Hardenne and No. 2 Kim Clijsters sidelined, the sisters' history on grass makes them the most likely title contenders and they could meet in the final. Serena jumped from a No. 10 ranking to a No. 1 seeding, and Venus went from No. 8 to No. 3.

Serena won the last two Wimbledons, and Venus played in the past four finals, winning in 2000 and 2001. Since combining to claim nine of 13 Slam titles, though, they've gone three majors without so much as a final appearance.

"Wimbledon is the perfect place for them to get that confidence back," said ESPN's Mary Joe Fernandez, a former pro. "They were dominating for a while, and they raised the level of women's tennis. They forced everyone to get stronger and get fitter -- that's what the Belgians did, and now the Russians are."

Anastasia Myskina became the first Russian woman to win a major by beating countrywoman Elena Dementieva in the French Open final.

Now the question becomes: Who's next? Six of the top 13 seeded women at Wimbledon are Russians, and No 8 Svetlana Kuznetsova, No. 10 Nadia Petrova, No. 12 Vera Zvonareva or No. 13 Maria Sharapova could make a run.

Just 17, can Sharapova take the giant leap to major champion?

"Whenever I go into a tournament, I never think I'm going to lose," Sharapova said. "Considering I've been playing well on grass the last three years and as a junior, I think 'Why not?'"