I have followed the discussions about the proposed smoke-free ordinance in Cape Girardeau. There are several valid questions with regard to personal rights and community health. However, when all the dust has settled, there are, in my opinion, several truths which should be acknowledged.
First, smoking and secondhand smoke are significant community health issues.
Secondly, there is no individual right to engage in an activity or practice that is harmful to others. That is why communities have laws to regulate traffic, building codes and other potentially harmful activities.
Lastly, businesses are regulated by government for good reason. Businesses are required to have licenses, inspections, permits and are expected to comply with municipal ordinances, state laws and federal guidelines. These measures were created to ensure fair practices and safety to citizens.
If left unchecked, many businesses could do what is best for business without regard to safety, health or fairness.
An ordinance prohibiting unhealthy practices such as smoking within a business is no different from a law restricting the sale of alcohol and tobacco to minors or prohibiting the use of dangerous chemicals in residential areas.
Secondhand smoke is a serious community health issue and causes disease and deaths throughout America. Many communities have already taken steps to protect their citizens and workforce from the dangers of secondhand smoke.
The voters of Cape Girardeau need to support the proposed smoke-free ordinance and vote yes to keep their community and future generations safe and healthy.
RICK HETZEL, Cape Girardeau
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.