By Mike Parker
On Wednesday, the Southeast Missouri State University Board of Regents will consider a proposal to make official changes to the university's nickname and mascot. There has been much discussion in public and private about the issues surrounding the used of the "Indian" and "Otahkian" nicknames, and much has been written about the groups that have publicly endorsed their retirement.
As the first group to advocate the change, the Southeast Missouri State University Alumni Association is compelled at this important time in the life of the university to provide further explanation for our recommendation.
Throughout the past two decades, a number of groups have actively promoted a change in the school nickname and mascot. However, the alumni association chose a passive role. We felt it unnecessary to participate in the potentially divisive issue.
However, in 2003 when it became clear to us that the absence of a widely accepted nickname and mascot was hurting the reputation of the university among other institutions and the NCAA and even the school spirit of our current students, we could be passive no longer.
In response, a special subcommittee was formed to study the issue and present findings to the alumni association's board, a group of more than 30 alumni volunteers, at our July 2003 meeting. It is important to mention that two of three subcommittee members were former athletes who had previously expressed their views against changing the mascot. This was deliberate to ensure that any recommendation advocating a change was subject to a high degree of scrutiny and was, in the end, more valid.
When the report was presented, there was consensus that our decision would need to be based on facts and separated from our own emotions. We could not rely solely on our memories of the once beautiful traditions surrounding the Indian nickname and mascot, such as the solemn pre-game ceremony of the Indian chief and princess overlooking the football field, which was a unifying tradition for Southeast students in the past.
Rather, we had to make a decision in the best interests of the entire Southeast family: students of yesterday, today and tomorrow.
It was clear to us that the majority of students from recent years held little or no allegiance to the symbolic Indian. In addition, there is little indication that the symbol will ever again resonate with Southeast students as it did with many of us some years ago. How different my memories of college would be without those special, pride-filled symbols.
When the vote of the alumni association came, the near-unanimous assent was in favor of retiring the Indian nickname and mascot with honor while working with students and other organizations to identify and lift up a new and meaningful tradition for generations of students to come.
For the good of the institution, it is our hope that the regents will seize this moment and endorse a change that, while not easy, is obviously needed and warranted. Let's move beyond this question and begin to celebrate a unifying symbol and rallying cry that will unite our alumni, students and community.
Our hope is that generations of future alumni will feel the same sense of pride and tradition that we continue to feel for the university.
Mike Parker of Sikeston, Mo., (Class of 1967) is the president of the Southeast Missouri State University Alumni Association.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.