custom ad
OpinionApril 1, 1996

To the editor: Does not the state of Missouri have a moral obligation to ensure that the women of Missouri who are contemplating an abortion make an informed decision and act freely on that decision? Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 741, the Caregiver Bill, attempts to do just that...

Thomas G. Hooyman

To the editor:

Does not the state of Missouri have a moral obligation to ensure that the women of Missouri who are contemplating an abortion make an informed decision and act freely on that decision? Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 741, the Caregiver Bill, attempts to do just that.

Vetoed by Gov. Mel Carnahan following last year's legislative session, the Caregiver Bill has been reintroduced. Previous versions of this bill were criticized because its opponents felt the bill didn't have enough safeguards with confidentiality, made it difficult to find a caregiver and didn't provide penalties for harassment against a woman. The current version has addressed those concerns, and now it is a better piece of legislation.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

This bill is basically about informed consent, a principle of medical ethics central to the practice of medicine in the United States. The pro-choice position bases its argument upon the woman's right to choose. However, in order to choose, one must have all of the necessary information. Otherwise, one isn't making an informed choice.

THOMAS G. HOOYMAN, Medical Ethicist

St. John's Mercy Health System

St. Louis

Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!