Shielding sources

In the course of gathering information that may or may not become a news story, reporters from time to time pledge to safeguard the anonymity of their sources. In these instances, information considered vital to the public's interests can be obtained only if sources believe their identity will never be revealed.

Currently, 31 states plus the District of Columbia have shield laws that protect, to various degrees, anonymous sources. While this protection means reporters and editors don't have to disclose their sources except in unusual circumstances, shield laws more importantly protect the sources themselves. Recent experience has shown that whistle-blowers and others whose jobs and reputations are at stake are well-served by shield laws.

Shield-law bills have been introduced in the Missouri Legislature this year, following unsuccessful attempts last year to get committee hearings on such proposals. State Sen. Jason Crowell of Cape Girardeau is a sponsor of one of those bills.

There are important issues to be ironed out, and committee deliberations of these shield-law proposals would go a long way in dealing with those issues. Floor debate in the House and Senate would offer further opportunities to refine these measures.

Given the bipartisan support of shield laws in the legislature, let's hope those who are opposed will, in fairness, allow full consideration of these measures. Missourians would be well-served by shield laws.