custom ad
OpinionJuly 12, 1997

The National Education Association -- the nation's largest teacher's union -- has had a welcomed change of heart. NEA membership now allows that teachers should be able to rate the performance of fellow instructors. It is a marked change for an organization concerned chiefly with wages and benefits, as opposed to quality education in the classroom...

The National Education Association -- the nation's largest teacher's union -- has had a welcomed change of heart. NEA membership now allows that teachers should be able to rate the performance of fellow instructors.

It is a marked change for an organization concerned chiefly with wages and benefits, as opposed to quality education in the classroom.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

But NEA's leap on the bandwagon for teacher performance standards may come at a steep price. NEA members want more bargaining power and executive decision making in return for more cooperation with school boards and administration. NEA leader Bob Chase has promoted this "new unionism" since he took office.

One also has to wonder if the NEA is really ready to do its part to clean up public education, or is merely on a public relations mission. Membership in all unions, including NEA, has continued to decline.

Weeding out bad teachers is fundamental. But if it comes at the cost of greater NEA powers, public education should think twice.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!