CONGRESSIONAL REFORM NEEDED MORE THAN EVER

Given the current national disposition toward dealings in Washington, D.C., calls for the reform of Congress should take no one by surprise. They ascend from time to time, usually when some scandal or other seeps from the corridors of power. As an auspicious by-product of the recent House banking outrage, talk of reform might gain some national attention and popular backing. Braced for the customary letdown, we are nonetheless hopeful.

U.S. Sen. Christopher Bond brought the most recent message of reform, offering some suggestions during his visit to the Lincoln Day event here last weekend. What the Missouri senator proposes is a bit like bride's apparel (something old, something new, something borrowed ...), but much of it is hard to argue with, displaying insight and practicality. It goes without saying that the application of rational reforms to a system where folly is too often the norm might encounter some institutional (i.e., political) resistance.

Bond proposes, among other things, that both houses of Congress establish a panel of retired judges to review matters of ethics. This arrangement would supplant ethics committees in each chamber and the current practice of lawmakers sitting in judgment of their colleagues. In addition, the senator hopes reforms can produce a more reasonable budget process, particularly as it relates to the growth of entitlement appropriations. Bond also said he would like to see a reduction in committee staffs (something that will win no popularity points on Capitol Hill) and a mandatory adjournment date. This latter proposal is especially attractive; Congress has become an extended enterprise our forefathers hadn't intended, and we believe that shorter sessions could be inaugurated to greater results.

Ultimately, voters hold the greatest key to reform and can exercise it be carrying out their constitutional rights at the ballot box. The talk of reform makes it all the more important for citizens to study issues (not just one scandal) and candidates' views on effecting positive change in government. If you don't like what you hear, make your vote express your feelings. We commend congressional calls for reform within that institution ... but would feel even more comfortable leaving the task to the American public.