AMENDMENTS 1 AND 10 DESERVING OF `NO' VOTES

The American electorate is a rather capricious beast during this unusual political year. Given recent history and the general mood concerning government, however, one thing seems clear: Americans aren't anxious to pay more taxes. On Nov. 3, Missourians will consider a couple of ballot measures that will make it easier for certain tax increases to be imposed. This prospect doesn't enthuse us, nor do we think it will most taxpayers. We urge Missourians to vote down Amendments 1 and 10.

Amendment 1 decreases the number of "yes" votes required to approve certain tax hikes. The Missouri Constitution now mandates a two-thirds majority of votes (almost 67 percent) in certain instances: when cities want to increase their operating levies above $1, first-class counties above 35 cents, all other counties above 50 cents and school districts above $3.75. If approved, the amendment would mandate only a four-sevenths majority (about 57 percent) on these ballot issues, except during a special election (when the two-thirds majority would still apply). The only case being made for this is that some believe it is too difficult to approve such tax measures ... to which we say, "Good, let it be difficult."

Amendment 10 is being voted on statewide (because it represents a constitutional change) but it impacts only the city of St. Louis. Passage would reduce the number of "yes" votes needed to raise property taxes to pay off bonds in the city from two-thirds to four-sevenths in all elections. The cynical out-state vote on this issue would be affirmative, since only those in this urban area would suffer the consequences. On principle, though, a "no" vote is preferable.

The current constitutional provisions in these cases were employed for a reason, to make it harder to pass large tax increases. We favor this reasoning. Extraordinary majorities should be necessary when extraordinary demands are being made on taxpayers. If government officials are frustrated that tax issues are failing, they should put forward better issues, those that present a reasonable revenue increase and a clear guideline for how it will be used. Provided this, voters will do the right thing, regardless of the majority required.

Constitutional requirements now in force are sound. We see no reason to amend the provisions on voting majorities for tax measures. We urge "No" votes on Amendments 1 and 10.