|
|
Fog/Mist ~ River stage: 33.56 Rising Saturday, November 21, 2009 |
|
A Couple Big Idea-ERS About Health Care Reform
Posted Friday, October 30, 2009, at 12:00 AM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Allow me to summarize what I learned from attending the Howard Dean / Newt Gingrich debate regarding health care reform that was held at the Show-Me-Center Wednesday night.
Our health care system is really messed up. It will be really expensive to fix. The solution will be a compromise that no one really likes. Any problems will be The Other Sides' fault. I think that pretty much recaps much of the two-hour event. While the debate did not break any new ground or reveal a silver bullet cure to our ailing health care system, I did find both speakers articulate and engaging and Newt Gingrich was a lot funnier than I anticipated. Honestly, I wasn't really sure what to expect before the event. Secretly, I kind of hoped that Howard Dean would let loose with one of those infamous "Dean Screams" like the yowl he uttered during his concession speech at the 2004 Iowa Democratic caucuses. Some people credit that screech for derailing his Presidential campaign. But Wednesday night there was no scream. However, Dean did have an endearing way of pronouncing the word "idea." Idea-ER is how he said the word several times during the event. It must be a New England kind of thing. I like it. I think I'm going to start pronouncing that word that way. Or is that a bad idea-ER?
It was reported in the Southeast Missourian yesterday that the two speakers were paid a total of $85,450 for appearing at the University. However, what wasn't noted was the fact that Gingrich was paid $58,450 while Dean got a measly $27,000. At first, I thought Gingrich just had a savvier agent, who cut a better deal with the University. However, I think the real reason for the discrepancy in pay is because Howard Dean is an actual medical doctor. Since he and Gingrich were coming here to debate healthcare reform and Dean is a physician, I bet that $27,000 is the "Maximum Allowable Amount" he could legally be paid for speaking. That makes sense. He'll probably write off the remaining $31,450 on his taxes as pro bono debating.
While many of the comments made by both speakers were quite compelling, Gingrich touched on one of my personal hot-buttons. He believes that the country needs tort-reform. I am strongly opposed to this. I like torts -- cherry is my favorite -- and feel that government has no business messing with my choice of pastries. If we let the government start touching our torts, in no time at all they'll want to dabble with our danishes and finger our bearclaws. When will the madness end? God help them, if the bureaucrats even think about diddling with my doughnuts... I'm still not sure what this had to do with health-care reform or why Gingrich was so concerned about this issue. It looks to me like he's enjoyed a tort or two over the years.
While Dean and Gingrich offered no specific solutions to this looming health care predicament, I put my Old Thinking Cap on -- it's an orange beanie with flames painted on the sides AND has a honest-to-goodness propeller -- and gave the whole matter some Deep Thought. I believe that I have come up with a two-pronged solution for a key aspect of the health care problems our country will be facing in the years ahead. One big issue that both speakers touched upon Wednesday night was the fact that American's are living a lot longer, thanks in large part to advancements in medicine. That means that millions of boomers reaching retirement age within in the next decade will likely stress the already stretched Medicare system beyond capacity. The trillion-dollar question is this: Who is going to pay for the medical needs of all of these retirees? While this may appear to require a very complex solution, I believe it is quite simple. The first part of my solution is to make 100 the new retirement age. Our country just can't afford it to be any lower. We need every able body citizen working to pay for the people who need medical attention right now until they HAVE to have medical attention themselves. Now, don't get me wrong. While I am proposing we increase the current retirement age by 34 years, I'm not suggesting that seniors keep doing the same strenuous jobs that got them to the OLD retirement age of 66. While I believe seniors should continue working, there are plenty of less stressful jobs they could be put in charge of. For instance, I think Wal-Mart could significantly expand the number of greeter positions it has at every store. Rather than having one senior citizen welcoming shoppers at each entrance, I believe they could have one per aisle. "Hi, I'm Imogene. Welcome to the Wal-Mart cat-food aisle." I figure that every Wal-Mart must have at least 100 aisles and if each one of them had a greeter assigned to it 24/7, a single store could put about 500 senior citizens to work. Howard Dean noted that before Medicare was created in the 1960s that the elderly were the poorest age group in the country. After Medicare was created, he said that was no longer the case and children are now the poorest group. This actually made sense. Children should be poor, since a lot of those little freeloaders don't work. Personally, I think this is wrong and this is the second part of my health care solution. Our health care system needs every nickel that can be wrung out of the citizenry and our country has no room for slackers even if they haven't learned their multiplication tables or how to spell. My feeling is that if our country's senior citizens are going to forgo their golden years -- Unless of course they've snagged a job as the fry-guy at McDonald's, you know The Golden Arches and all -- then all of our children are going to have to share the burden as well. I believe the country needs to finally admit that child-labor laws have been a failed experiment and that the youth of America should start earning their way in the world rather than wasting 12 years getting a "diploma." Let's be honest. Education is way over-rated. Learning a trade is far more important and I for one will put the shoe-making skills of our kindergarteners up against those of a Southeast Asian 5-year-old any day. While some people might not appreciate this two-pronged solution on how to pay for health care reform, the fact remains that our current health care system is a mess and is only going to get worse. Something has to be done and done soon. But I have faith. This is the U.S. of A, the country that has given birth to countless innovations over the centuries. We've overcome a lot worse issues and I'm confident we can do the same with health care reform. All we need are a few big idea-ERS. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Brad Hollerbach is the Director of Information Technology for the Southeast Missourian. He writes this blog primarily for his own amusement and to parody the absurdities of the world we live in. He lives with his wife and cat in Cape.
To receive email notifications that Brad has a new blog available, click here. Hot topics Go Fighting Smileys!Competition Is Bad, At Least It Is For Higher-Ed (
A Couple Big Idea-ERS About Health Care Reform
MASSIVE Cape Mardi Gras Effort To Rival New Orleans
Happy Anniversary... And Thanks For Reading
Expiration Date of this Blog: Never
|
I will finally make a decision and take a stance on the health care debate: I will side with Newt Gingrich... why? Who needs to be informed with facts, I'll just go with him because he has a cooler name.
As far as the Wal-Mart greeter for every aisle, I really like the idea, especially if they can serve as an 'aisle-enforcer' and move people along. It always annoys me to have a wall of people blocking the aisle who don't know what they want and spend 5 minutes trying to decide between Chewy or regular Chips-Ahoy, or looking through all of the salad dressing to save 2 cents.
"little freeloaders" HeeHaw! What about our pets? I know a black and white dog that could pull a cart with light loads of whatever and he works for about $19/month (dog food). We could put them through the wringer too!
If your Wal-Mart idea ever comes to fruition, I have a feeling the number of senior citizens killed or seriously injured by shopping carts will rise exponentially. I mean, which do you think poses less of a threat: Watching "The Price is Right" or saying hi to a 300-pound man stocking up on frozen White Castle burgers?
My pet peeve are the family reunions that are held at Wal-Mart on the weekends. I'm pretty sure those are a key component of my own personal version of Hell.
I do like the Aisle Enforcer idea. Here's a thought. Let's give the Seniors tasers to help facilitate the clearing of any aisle blockages.
Even gives us a catchy acronym - Seniors With Tasers or SWAT. I think that would also minimize Sam's concern about the seniors getting injured. Do you really think that a 300-pound man is going to mess with Grandma if he knows she's packing 50,000 volts? I don't think so.
As far as pets are concerned I don't think they should be exempt either especially considering the high cost of their own health care. If a dog can pull a cart, then so be it. I wonder if they make pet-friendly Endust? Our cat is extremely furry and could double as a dust-mop.
Thanks for reading.
It should be "IDEE". Let's so it the Southern way. I am underwhelmed by New England anything.
Since Willie's went out of business, torts just ain't what they used to be.
I was at this prestigious event and you nailed it. Actually, I have my own story to tell about this event, but the university is monitoring this blog so do not want to put strain on an already strained organization.....HA!
Really, you are hilarious and I laughed till I nearly......