custom ad
OpinionJuly 6, 2004

The Lima (Ohio) News We're disturbed by a 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday that requires citizens to provide their names to police officers, even if those officers have no probable cause that the person whose name they seek committed any sort of crime...

The Lima (Ohio) News

We're disturbed by a 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday that requires citizens to provide their names to police officers, even if those officers have no probable cause that the person whose name they seek committed any sort of crime.

This will lead to fishing expeditions by police agencies.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

It is a serious undermining of privacy rights.

Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy argued that "obtaining a suspect's name in the course of a stop serves important government interests." Perhaps.

But the main interest of the U.S. Constitution is to protect individual prerogatives against unjustified incursions by the state.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!