To the editor:
My husband and I have always watched CBS for what we thought was accurate and concise news. In the past, we thought Dan Rather was biased when it came to political issues, but recently I believe he blatantly crossed the line.
I believe it is important that a newscaster report the news as an impartial party, but on several occasions it is very clear where Rather stands. The latest incident concerning President Bush's military record was clearly biased and, as it turns out, untrue.
CBS has quietly apologized for the error, but my question is: Where was your staff whose job it is to validate such stories before the news was aired? When you print an incorrect and very damaging article concerning one's reputation on the front page of a newspaper and a small article apologizing on the back page, the damage is done.
I am tired of hearing John Kerry's Bush bashing. I think he should be addressing the issues that are important to the American people.
The problem with Kerry is his record speaks louder than his words. By diverting the public's attention from his record, he is hoping to win the election.
I believe this is the most important presidential election this country has ever had. As a Christian living in the Bible Belt, I believe the choice for America is clear. If we value the freedoms America was built on, the choice is clearly George Bush.
JANA ORR, Sikeston, Mo.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.