custom ad
NewsAugust 29, 2007

ST. LOUIS (AP) -- The towering Gateway Arch "stands in splendid isolation," too far removed from downtown with too little activity around it, according to a report by a foundation headed by former Sen. John Danforth that proposes obtaining part of the Arch grounds from the federal government...

By JIM SALTER ~ Associated Press Writer

ST. LOUIS (AP) -- The towering Gateway Arch "stands in splendid isolation," too far removed from downtown with too little activity around it, according to a report by a foundation headed by former Sen. John Danforth that proposes obtaining part of the Arch grounds from the federal government.

"We are wasting our two most valuable assets -- the Gateway Arch and our position on America's greatest river," Danforth said of the report released Wednesday by the Danforth Foundation. "There is little to do at the riverfront, and the Arch -- one of the world's greatest and most beautiful monuments -- stands in splendid isolation."

The Arch is part of the 91-acre Jefferson National Expansion Memorial. Beyond the 630-foot-tall monument itself, the underground museum below the Arch and the historic Old Courthouse, the rest of the property is green space along the Mississippi River.

Most of the grounds are separated by the rest of downtown by Interstate 70. A bridge carries both vehicles and pedestrians over the interstate, but the walk is unattractive, noisy, smells of car fumes and can be dangerous. City and civic leaders for years have looked at better ways to link to the grounds.

The foundation report does not specify how much of the Arch grounds the city would seek to take over from the National Park Service. Doing so would require an act of Congress. Park Service officials declined comment, and Arch superintendent Peggy O'Dell did not return phone messages.

The Danforth report said the goal would be to develop an area for active uses such as those found at Chicago's Millennium Park. The study, begun two years ago and was conducted at the request of Mayor Francis Slay, who called development of the riverfront and a connector linking downtown "a major priority."

Danforth, a three-term Republican senator and former ambassador whose family founded Ralston-Purina, said key to any riverfront redevelopment is the Arch grounds.

Architect Eero Saarinen's Arch opened in 1965 at a cost of $13 million as a tribute to westward expansion. The monument draws hundreds of thousands of visitors each year and has become the city's most recognizable symbol.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

But from the day the two legs of the Arch were joined, civic leaders have sought a better way to merge the monument and its grounds with the rest of downtown. Slay said four different studies have considered the dilemma, but the Danforth Foundation was the first to employ engineering and modeling analyses recommended by the Coast Guard and Army Corps of Engineers.

The foundation said the revitalized riverfront should include restaurants, ice skating, swimming, fountains and other features and activities. But key to the project, the report said, was taking over part of the Arch grounds, most of which sits high enough above the river to avoid the risk of flooding.

The plan seeks a three-block deck over I-70, providing easier and safer access for visitors.

The study does not specify how much of the Arch property would be sought.

The portion of the Arch grounds would be transferred to a yet-to-be defined local entity.

Slay asked three civic leaders -- Walter Metcalfe, Robert Archibald and Peter Raven -- for further advice on developing the riverfront development and connector. Metcalfe is the former chairman of the Bryan Cave law firm; Archibald is president and CEO of the Missouri Historical Society; Raven is director of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said in a statement she backs the plan.

"It's a tremendous resource that is underutilized and I'm very supportive of what Sen. Danforth and Mayor Slay are trying to do," McCaskill said.

A spokesman for Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., did not return a phone call seeking comment.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!