custom ad
NewsApril 20, 2016

RICHMOND, Va. -- A Virginia high school discriminated against a transgender teen by forbidding him from using the boys' restroom, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday in a case that could have implications for a North Carolina law critics say discriminates against LGBT people...

By LARRY OÂ’DELL ~ Associated Press
Gavin Grimm on his front porch Aug. 25 at his home in Gloucester, Virginia.
Gavin Grimm on his front porch Aug. 25 at his home in Gloucester, Virginia.Steve Helber ~ Associated Press

RICHMOND, Va. -- A Virginia high school discriminated against a transgender teen by forbidding him from using the boys' restroom, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday in a case that could have implications for a North Carolina law critics say discriminates against LGBT people.

The case of Gavin Grimm has been watched closely since North Carolina enacted a law last month that bans transgender people from using public restrooms that correspond to their gender identity.

That law also bans cities from passing anti-discrimination ordinances, a response to an ordinance recently passed in Charlotte.

In the Virginia case, a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals -- which also covers North Carolina -- ruled 2-1 to overturn the Gloucester County School Board's policy. The court said the policy violated Title IX, the federal law that prohibits discrimination in schools.

The ruling also said a federal judge who previously rejected Grimm's discrimination claim ignored a U.S. Department of Education rule that transgender students in public schools must be allowed to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity.

"We agree that it has indeed been commonplace and widely accepted to separate public restrooms, locker rooms, and shower facilities on the basis of sex," the court wrote in its opinion. "It is not apparent to us, however, that the truth of these propositions undermines the conclusion we reach regarding the level of deference due to the department's interpretation of its own regulations."

Maxine Eichner, a University of North Carolina law professor who is an expert on sexual orientation and the law, said the ruling -- the first of its kind by a federal appeals court -- means the provision of North Carolina's law pertaining to restroom use by transgender students in schools that receive federal funds also is invalid.

"The effects of this decision on North Carolina are clear," she said, adding a judge in that state will have no choice but to apply the appeals court's ruling.

North Carolina Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, speaking to reporters after the decision was made public, said he disagrees with what he calls Democratic President Barack Obama's "objective to force our high schools to allow a boy in a woman's or girl's locker-room facility." He said high schools should be allowed to make "appropriate arrangements for those students that have unique circumstances."

McCrory said the ruling "puts a whole dynamic" on North Carolina's law.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

Other states in the 4th Circuit are Maryland, West Virginia and South Carolina. While those states are affected directly by the appeals court's ruling, Eichner said the effect will be broader.

"It is a long and well-considered opinion that sets out the issues," she said. "It will be influential in other circuits."

Appeals court Judge Paul V. Niemeyer, who was appointed to the appeals court by Republican President George H.W. Bush, wrote in a dissenting opinion that the majority's opinion "completely tramples on all universally accepted protections of privacy and safety that are based on the anatomical differences between the sexes."

The majority opinion was written by Judge Henry F. Floyd and joined by Judge Andre M. Davis, both Obama appointees. The Richmond-based court was long considered the nation's most conservative federal appeals court, but a series of vacancies in the last few years has allowed Obama to reshape it. Including the two senior judges, the court now has 10 judges appointed by Democrats and seven by Republicans.

The school board could appeal the decision to the full appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court. David Patrick Corrigan, attorney for the school board, did not immediately respond to a telephone message.

Grimm was born female but identifies as male. He was allowed to use the boys' restrooms at the school for several weeks in 2014. But after some parents complained, the school board adopted a policy requiring students to use either the restroom that corresponds with their biological gender or a private, single-stall restroom.

Grimm called the policy stigmatizing. School officials said the policy respects the privacy of all students.

The 16-year-old Gloucester High School junior said he was "dead to the world asleep" at noon, catching up after a couple of nights of insomnia, when the phone rang with what he called the best news he can remember ever receiving.

Because the school board could appeal further, it's unclear whether Grimm will be able to use the boys' room anytime soon -- but he said he's not worried about that.

"Hopefully this is the beginning of the end of the situation," Grimm said in a telephone interview. "I'm just going to take things one day at a time."

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!