custom ad
NewsAugust 15, 2016

ST. LOUIS -- The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office sided with the maker of Schlafly beer in its trademark dispute with conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly. Phyllis Schlafly sought to block St. Louis Brewery's effort to trademark the brand's name, an effort that began in 2012 as its sales began to grow outside of Missouri...

Associated Press
Phyllis Schlafly
Phyllis Schlafly

ST. LOUIS -- The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office sided with the maker of Schlafly beer in its trademark dispute with conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly.

Phyllis Schlafly sought to block St. Louis Brewery's effort to trademark the brand's name, an effort that began in 2012 as its sales began to grow outside of Missouri.

Earlier this month, the Patent and Trademark Office dismissed opposition filed by the St. Louis native and her son, Bruce Schlafly, rejecting the argument a trademark shouldn't be allowed because it's primarily a surname, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.

"In connection with its usage as a surname, it has the connotation of conservative values, which to millions of Americans (such as Baptists and Mormons) means abstinence from alcohol," according to the filing by Phyllis Schlafly.

Bruce Schlafly's opposition alleged trademarking the Schlafly name could affect the orthopedic surgeon's reputation negatively by associating his name with alcohol.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

The decision doesn't mean the trademark has been awarded to the brewery but removes an impediment.

The brewery was co-founded in 1991 by Tom Schlafly, who is Phyllis Schlafly's nephew by marriage.

Tom Schlafly told the Post-Dispatch the decision "shows what we argued all along -- that the name has achieved distinctiveness in regards to beer."

"It's a huge relief," Tom Schlafly said. "It guarantees that someone else can't brew beer and call it Schlafly. As we continue to make investments in the business and grow, it provides protection."

Phyllis Schlafly, who will turn 92 today, declined comment. But her son and lawyer, Andy Schlafly, said he may appeal.

"I'm disappointed that the decision did not come to terms with the purpose of the statute that generally prohibits obtaining a trademark in a last name," he said.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!