WASHINGTON -- The House signed off Tuesday on a compromise $28.9 billion anti-terrorism package, capping a four-month fight that saw lawmakers heed President Bush's demands to limit the bill's cost.
Half the measure's money was for the stepped-up battle against terrorism that the Pentagon and intelligence agencies have waged since the Sept. 11 attacks. Other recipients included New York's rebuilding efforts, federal aviation safety programs, local emergency agencies, allies like Afghanistan and the Philippines and a slew of home-district projects won by lawmakers.
"This bill is critical to winning the war on terrorism," said Rep. Randy Cunningham, R-Calif.
The House approved the measure by 397-32 after only an hour of debate, and Senate passage was expected Wednesday. The money is for the rest of the federal budget year that ends Sept. 30.
The bill's contents were widely popular, but Bush's request last March for a $27.1 billion version of the measure ignited an election-year battle over its proper size. The Democratic-run Senate's bill reached $31.5 billion, but with huge budget deficits on a comeback, White House officials threatened to veto anything exceeding the Republican-run House's near $29 billion cost.
For a while, Democrats used Bush's demands for lower spending to question his seriousness about shoring up security. Even many Republicans wanted more money than Bush, and White House budget chief Mitchell Daniels bore the wrath of lawmakers from both parties over his insistence that his bottom-line demands not be surpassed.
But with the federal fiscal year nearing its end amid administration complaints that the Pentagon and Transportation Security Administration were scrounging for dollars, party leaders were unwilling to wage a veto fight against a popular president.
"We simply need to get on with it, and we need to get this down to the president," said Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, one of the leading Democratic authors of the package.
By the time the House-Senate compromise was written, lawmakers had sprinkled it with items for the folks back home.
Such projects included $6 million to upgrade a U.S. Geological Survey data center near Sioux Falls, S.D.; $10 million to help farmers near the Rio Grande River involved in a water dispute with Mexico; $7 million for enhancing water supplies in New Mexico; and a provision to reimburse poultry producers in West Virginia and Virginia for losses from avian influenza.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.