Court filing states woman in Greitens' affair unsure of memory

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Attorneys defending Gov. Eric Greitens against a felony invasion-of-privacy charge have raised new doubts about a key allegation he took a nonconsensual photo of a partially nude woman with whom he had an affair.

In a court filing dated Sunday, Greitens' attorneys say the woman testified during a Friday deposition she never saw Greitens with a camera or phone on the day he is accused of taking a partially nude photo of her while she was blindfolded and her hands bound.

The court filing states the woman also testified she doesn't know whether her belief he had a phone was the result of a dream.

The filing is labeled as a motion to compel St. Louis city prosecutors to turn over any previously undisclosed testimony or evidence that may be beneficial to Greitens' criminal defense. It comes as Greitens' defense team has been urging a special Missouri House committee to delay its own investigatory report -- planned to be released this week -- until after Greitens' trial in May.

Greitens acknowledged in January he had an extramarital affair in 2015 as he was preparing to run for governor. That came as St. Louis television station KMOV aired a report in which the woman describes a March 21, 2015, encounter with Greitens during a conversation her husband secretly recorded.

In that recorded conversation, the woman said Greitens invited her into the basement of his St. Louis home, where he tied her hands to some exercise rings, blindfolded her and partially undid her clothing. She said she saw a flash through the blindfold and Greitens said to her, "You're never going to mention my name, otherwise there will be pictures of me everywhere."

Greitens has denied blackmailing the woman but has not directly answered questions about whether he took a photo.

A St. Louis grand jury indicted Greitens in February for allegedly taking the photo and transmitting it in a way it could be accessed by a computer.

The court filing by Greitens' attorneys said the woman participated in a lengthy deposition Friday. After acknowledging she hadn't seen a camera or phone, she was asked whether she saw what she believed to be a phone.

"I haven't talked about it because I don't know if it's because I'm remembering it through a dream or I -- I'm not sure, but yes, I feel like I saw it after that happened," she responded, according to the court filing.

The court filing states the woman also acknowledged she sent partially nude images of herself to Greitens in June 2015 and had willingly continued to see him for months after the March 2015 encounter. Greitens attorneys said that was an indication she didn't feel like her privacy had been violated.

A phone message for the woman's attorney was not immediately returned Monday.

A spokeswoman for St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner had no immediate comment.

Associated Press reporter Jim Salter contributed from St. Louis.