custom ad
NewsOctober 10, 2016

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- A union representing Columbia police officers is suing the city after it refused to release some public records and asked for what the union called "exorbitant" fees to fulfill the request. The Columbia Police Officers Association filed the lawsuit Thursday. ...

By MARGARET STAFFORD ~ Associated Press

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- A union representing Columbia police officers is suing the city after it refused to release some public records and asked for what the union called "exorbitant" fees to fulfill the request.

The Columbia Police Officers Association filed the lawsuit Thursday. It alleges the city violated Missouri's open-records law and wants a judge to order it to release all the documents the union is seeking and to provide a "reasonable and lawful" estimate of the costs of producing the documents.

The suit stems from a July request by the union for all emails between chief Ken Burton and deputy chief Jill Schlude written from June 1 to July 22. The lawsuit alleges the city did not reply within the legally required three business days and said it would cost $840 to fulfill the request.

The lawsuit comes after years of contention between the union and city officials over such issues as safety, shift times and low morale, the association's executive director, Dale Roberts, said Friday.

"We are in almost constant negotiation with the city over terms and conditions of employment," Roberts said. "With the first request, we're trying to get a look at the command staff and see if we can find a way to reach a middle ground."

Roberts declined to say why emails only from June 1 to July 22 were requested.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

The city contended it would cost that much because Burton, Schlude and records supervisor Lydia Green would have to review the emails to redact information that was not public record. The amount included a $142.67 "benefits" charge, but that charge later was dropped.

In September, the union asked for copies of an anonymous survey department employees took to measure morale in the police department. The city declined to release those records, contending the survey could contain information that would identify employees and thus was not a public record. The union argues the open-records law exempts only individually identifiable records and does not include anonymous surveys.

Roberts said previous surveys by the city and the union found low morale and a "toxic" environment in the police department.

City manager Mike Matthes passed out a survey at shift meetings in August, has told union officials his survey found police morale was not low and questioned whether the union's surveys were honest.

"We just don't believe what the city manager is saying about the survey," Roberts said. "So we asked to see (his results)."

City spokesman Steven Sapp said officials would not comment Friday because they were still were reviewing the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also asks the city be ordered to pay the union's attorneys' fees, court costs and a $5,000 penalty for each violation.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!