HAVANA, Cuba -- Almost any way you look at it, in terms of trade, academic exchanges or international standing, Cuba's spring offensive against domestic political opponents has cost it dearly.
Any way you look at it, that is, if you're not Fidel Castro.
The crackdown that sent 75 pro-democracy activists to prison and led to the execution of three young hijackers has brought to a screeching halt efforts in the U.S. Congress to ease the economic embargo imposed on Cuba soon after Castro took power 44 years ago.
While bad relations between Washington and Havana are as old as Castro's revolution, the harsh measures meted out in March and April also angered the European Union, Pope John Paul II, traditional allies in Latin America and leftist intellectuals.
The Cuban government's attitude is: So be it.
"The independence of Cuba is priceless. Perhaps it will have a cost, but principles are more valuable," said Rafael Dausa, the Foreign Ministry official in charge of North American relations. "Perhaps tactically we lost, but strategically we won because we are saving the revolution."
That line of thinking, set out by Castro in recent speeches and echoed by those in his government, "handed the Bush administration what it wanted on a silver platter," said Brian Alexander, head of the Cuba Policy Foundation in Washington.
Human rights issue
Before the crackdown, the foundation had amassed considerable momentum to ease trade and travel restrictions against Cuba. But it folded its political tent April 23, announcing the resignation of its entire board of directors and declaring its revulsion at Cuba's human rights abuses.
"Our Achilles heel was that all our efforts were dependent on Cuba cooperating," Alexander said.
Not only did the crackdown on dissent validate the view that Cuba is a repressive regime that should be isolated and punished, he said, but it undermined the argument that, politics aside, Cuba could be a good place to do business.
"It's not. The risks are obvious if a regime is so retrograde that it's willing to undermine its own economy," the exasperated lobbyist said.
At the U.S. Interests Section here, a heavily guarded eight-story edifice that is an embassy in all but name, Ambassador James Cason said he stands by his opposition to any easing of the embargo because he has "not been convinced otherwise -- that it would do anything for human rights or economic freedom."
The Bush administration's new point man in the diplomatic clash with Castro, Cason arrived in Havana a year ago and embarked immediately on efforts to bolster the weak and fractured opposition to Castro. He met with fledgling dissident groups in the provinces. He mustered U.S. aid to independent libraries and publications. His home and Interests Section offices were made available for workshops and meetings aimed at strengthening the groups opposed to Castro.
It was that assertive attitude that outraged Castro, who in turn outraged friends and foes alike with his roundup of almost every dissident who had connections to Cason.
But unlike previous acts of repression by Castro that were aimed as much at Cuban exiles in the United States as at opponents in this country, the consequences of this crackdown have reached around the globe.
The 15-nation European Union, Cuba's largest trade partner and foreign investor, imposed sanctions in June to protest human rights abuses. The Europeans decided unanimously to limit high-level government contacts and participation in cultural events in Cuba.
It earlier froze Cuba's request to join the 2000 Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and African, Caribbean and Pacific nations. Membership would have made Cuba eligible for much-needed trade financing and aid. Castro reacted to the censure by staging noisy rallies outside European embassies and seizing the Spanish cultural center -- a move that angered the country from which the biggest pool of foreign investment has come to Cuba.
(Begin optional trim) Paris-based Reporters Without Borders, a media watchdog group, has embarked on a summer campaign to dissuade Europeans from vacationing in Cuba to protest the jailing of independent journalists. At least half of the 1.8 million tourists who came to Cuba in each of the past two years came from Europe.
Leftist intellectuals of world renown such as Mexican novelist Carlos Fuentes and Nobel literature laureate Jose Saramago of Portugal have broken with Castro over what they see as a betrayal of shared values.
Several high-profile Cuban entertainers have defected to the United States since the crackdown -- including pop star Carlos Manuel Pruneda -- citing desires to work in a more open society.
(End optional trim) Pope John Paul II censured Cuba's decision to impose the death penalty on three young men who attempted to hijack a passenger ferry to Florida in March. The Vatican's ignored appeal for clemency upset Catholic Cubans, who had been enjoying more religious freedom since the pope's 1998 visit.
Castro's challenge to U.S. domination and authority still attracts support in some areas of Latin America, and a few prominent figures continue to back him. Others, such as writer Gabriel Garcia Marquez, have remained silent.
In the United States, measures aimed at isolating Cuba were already so thorough that there was little more Washington could do to punish Castro without inflicting disproportionate harm on ordinary Cubans.
(Begin optional trim) A week after the dissident arrests, the U.S. Treasury Department approved new restrictions on educational and cultural exchanges with Cuba expected to cut deeply into people-to-people contacts. But those programs involve only about 10 percent of the U.S.
citizens traveling to Cuba; the majority of last year's 178,000 were exiles and emigres returning here for family visits. Those trips and the dollar remittances sent here remain legal.
The Treasury Department, which is responsible for enforcing the embargo against Cuba, last month turned down a license request from PWN Exhibitions International for a second food and agricultural trade fair in Cuba. The Connecticut firm staged the inaugural event in September to the cheers of both Cuban consumers and U.S. farm-belt marketers who have sold more than $200 million in food to Cuba since then.
(End optional trim) Dausa, the Foreign Ministry official, insisted in a nearly two-hour interview that the crackdown was provoked by the Bush administration and Cason's "violation of every standard of diplomatic behavior." He accused the U.S. envoy of drafting the dissidents into the paid service of a hostile foreign government.
(Optional Add End) Under a migration agreement signed by the United States and Cuba in 1994, the United States is obliged to issue at least 20,000 visas each year to Cubans wanting to resettle in the United States. Since stricter screening measures in the aftermath of the Sept.
11, 2001, terrorist attacks, processing of Cuban applications has backlogged, with only about 10 percent of the quota filled in the first nine months of this fiscal year.
"There is a double standard. Those who arrive illegally are cleared within 24 hours, but legal immigrants have to wait months," Dausa said. "This is why we think it's a pretext, to delay legal migration and encourage illegal migration." Cason dismissed the allegations as "nonsense," although he acknowledged that processing has fallen behind because of the more demanding verification procedures.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.