custom ad
NewsMarch 2, 2003

LONDON -- Opponents of military action against Iraq are as misguided as the appeasers who refused to stand up to Adolf Hitler in the 1930s, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said in comments published Saturday. In his latest attempt to win over Britons unconvinced of the need for war, Blair said he was "prepared to be judged by history" on Iraq...

The Associated Press

LONDON -- Opponents of military action against Iraq are as misguided as the appeasers who refused to stand up to Adolf Hitler in the 1930s, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said in comments published Saturday.

In his latest attempt to win over Britons unconvinced of the need for war, Blair said he was "prepared to be judged by history" on Iraq.

"A majority of decent and well-meaning people said there was no need to confront Hitler and that those who did were warmongers," Blair said in an interview with The Guardian newspaper.

"When people decided not to confront fascism, they were doing the popular thing, they were doing it for good reasons and they were good people ... but they made the wrong decision," he was quoted as saying.

Opponents of war reject the comparison. They say that unlike Hitler, and unlike Iraq before the 1991 Gulf War, Saddam Hussein has not invaded another country and does not yet have weapons that could threaten Britain.

Blair, a staunch supporter of President Bush's tough stance against Saddam, says ridding Iraq of chemical and biological weapons is crucial to international security.

In an apparent effort to show cooperation with U.N. disarmament demands, Iraq on Saturday began destroying its Al Samoud 2 missiles as ordered by chief weapons inspector Hans Blix.

British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the gesture would not be enough to avert military action.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

"It's a very familiar pattern," Straw told delegates at a Labor Party conference in Southport, northwest England. "Iraq first declares a total 'zero,' saying they have nothing illegal whatever to declare. Then, under pressure, they cynically trickle out concessions to divide the Security Council, buy time, and avert military action while continuing concealment."

"Even if he were to destroy his Al Samoud missiles, enormous stocks of poisonous chemicals and diseases would remain in the hands of (his) regime," he added.

But many in Britain, and in Blair's own Labor Party, feel United Nations weapons inspectors should be given more time. On Wednesday, 122 Labor lawmakers joined 77 others in the House of Commons to vote for a motion which called the case for war "unproven." The government defeated the amendment with 393 votes, but it was still the biggest revolt Blair has faced since Labor was elected by a large majority in 1997.

Blair told The Guardian he respected the views of dissenters -- but would not be moved by them.

"In the end, people have to vote how they feel," Blair said. "But my job is to say how I feel ... why I believe that what we are doing is right and why I believe that to do what the opponents of my position want us to do would be very, very dangerous for our country and the world."

He also rejected charges he has meekly followed policies set out by the U.S. administration.

Blair said he raised concerns about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction at his first meeting with Bush, before the Sept. 11 attacks.

"I am truly committed to dealing with this, irrespective of the position of America," Blair said. "If the Americans were not doing this, I would be pressing them to be doing so."

Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!