BEIJING -- North Korea took less than a day to break the modest agreement it had made with the United States and four other nations at a six-party summit: to hold more talks aimed at ending a 10-month standoff over its nuclear weapons program.
Instead, North Korea angrily dismissed the possibility of further negotiations over its nuclear program on Saturday, the morning after the end of landmark six-nation talks where the isolated regime indicated it might be willing to reach a compromise.
"The talks only reinforced our confidence that there is no other option for us but to further increase the nuclear deterrent force," the North's Foreign Ministry said Saturday, its first official comment on the summit that ended in Beijing a day earlier.
North Korea has made similar threats before, and its trademark bluster often fails to draw urgent reactions from the ones it wants to threaten.
Instead, the region's dialogue partners, although they consider North Korea capable of such dangerous provocations as a missile test-launch, see the isolated country's harsh rhetoric as reflecting its entrenched mistrust of Americans and fear for the survival of its own totalitarian regime.
All six nations say they want the Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons. But the question comes down to whether the countries at the center of the dispute, the United States and North Korea, can trust each other, and which should make the first move.
Stalemate
Should the United State provide free oil shipments, open diplomatic ties, provide economic and humanitarian aid and sign a nonaggression pact before North Korea feels safe to abandon its nuclear facilities? Or should the North scrap its nuclear program before Washington improves relations?
"Both sides are leveling guns at each other. How can the DPRK trust the U.S. and drop its gun?" said the North Korean spokesman, using the acronym of his country's official name, Democratic People's Republic of Korea. "What we want is for both sides to drop guns at the same time and coexist peacefully."
The Americans consider North Koreans untrustworthy and want to avoid mistakes like the nuclear accord they signed with the North in 1994.
Under that agreement, the North promised to freeze its nuclear activities in return for economic aid, including $4.6 billion for power plants still under construction. But U.S. officials said last October that North Korea admitted running a secret nuclear weapons program -- a claim North Korea now denies.
North Korea, too, says it can't take any chances when dealing with the Americans. Kim Jong Il's regime sees its survival as depending on how profitably it plays its nuclear card.
Nuclear blackmail
After the crumbling of the Soviet bloc, which sustained North Korea with trade and arms deals, the country slipped into economic quagmire and now attempts to earn its way through by selling missiles and trading its "nuclear deterrent force" for economic aid and a U.S. promise not to attempt a regime change in Pyongyang. Washington calls the tactic "nuclear blackmail."
"North Korea's statement (on Saturday) seems to be aimed at pressuring the United States, since it believes it hasn't gained anything from the six-way talks," said Koh Yoo-hwan, a North Korea expert at Seoul's Dongkuk University.
Striving to mediate a compromise, the six nations agreed this week to seek a solution with "synchronized, or parallel, stages of implementation." What comes first in these phased-in stages could take years to sort out.
Although North Korea often warns of an impending nuclear war, its leaders know conflict with the United States would mean their end. Washington fears that in a war's initial hours, North Korea could shower artillery shells and missiles on Seoul, the crowded capital of South Korea, only 46 miles from the border with North Korea.
If North Korea had carried out its threat to walk out of the talks, it would have been a slap in the face of China, which enjoys growing trade ties with the United States but remains Pyongyang's closest ally and the provider of most of its energy needs and imports.
Beijing arranged and hosted the multilateral talks and wants to see them succeed, an outcome that would burnish its international image. Since Chinese troops fought American forces during the 1950-53 Korean War, Beijing has seen North Korea as a buffer against American influence in the region.
Russia, which first set up a client communist regime in the North at the end of World War II, now wants to link its Trans-Siberian railway and shaky economy with South Korean and Japanese exports and investors -- a project put on hold because of nuclear tensions.
South Korea and Japan have joined the United States in stating they have no intention of invading the North and would help its economy prosper once it gives up its nuclear program.
North Korea remains to be convinced.
When U.S. and Soviet forces divided the small peninsula nation following its liberation from brutal Japanese colonial rule in 1945, Koreans chanted a popular limerick: "Don't trust Americans! Don't be cheated by Russians! Koreans be careful! Or the Japanese will rise again."
In today's globalizing South Korea, those terse lines have little circulation. But they pretty much sum up the mood in the North.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.