Speak Out: Bill Clinton has given 13 $500,000.00 speechs since he left the Presidency. Eleven of them were while Hilary was Secretary of State. Anyone see a problem here?
Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:18 AM:
More than eight years out of office and he suddenly is a hot commodity! Hmmmmm!
Replies (66)
-- Posted by ▪Rick on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:21 AM
Rick,
I think a full audit of the Clinton Foundation and an investigation of the facts surrounding Bill being offered these lucrative speaking engagements should be made before America makes another dumb mistake.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:26 AM
Wheels, That was only the money that went over the table.
-- Posted by Old John on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:27 AM
-- Posted by Old John on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:27 AM
Old John,
I am beginning to think the most honest President the Democrats have ever put up was Harry Truman... at least he would not sell the Presidency for personal gain, over and over again as the current crop is doing. Although he did have a few questionable alliances with the Kansas City Pendergast Machine before hitting the national scene.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:33 AM
If Clinton is elected, all the 'C's will go missing from all the keyboards in the White House.:)
-- Posted by Old John on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:37 AM
My opinion, the Clintons are two of the most morally bankrupt people in America.
It didn't start here, but does anybody remember when their tax returns became public and they were caught taking ridiculous charity deductions like if I remember correctly somewhere in the range of $35 for a donated pair of Bill's Boxers or Briefs, whatever he wears.... probably a legion of women could clarify that. Hilary probably doesn't remember.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:49 AM
Looks to me by the Hillary attacks at this stage in the game has you righties very worried. I think it is humorous that you guys all say "guilty" before the evidence is presented. I was just wondering that the countries that were supposedly giving money to the Clinton Foundation, how many and how much money was given to these countries by the USA? I would be interested in knowing the answer to that also.
-- Posted by left turn on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:58 AM
--Posted by left turn on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 9:58 AM
Left: Good point, The USA gives money to a foreign country then that country gives the money right back to the Clinton Foundation....money laundry at the highest.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 10:11 AM
Lefty, Problem is, it will take years to dig through all the cover-up when the shovels are in the hands of the perpetrators.
-- Posted by Old John on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 11:00 AM
semo471, I don't know where the money goes. Do we have anyone who has oversight on where foreign money is spent or distributed by the recipients? To my knowledge, no. They may even support terrorist groups as far as I know.
-- Posted by left turn on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 11:30 AM
Rick, why do you put all the blame on Hillary and her supporters? It looks to me like you need to start putting the blame where it belongs on the repub candidates. Criticizing Hillary is not their path to the White House. They need to say what they will do for the country and the people. The most sane candidate they ever had was John Huntsman, but he wasn't a left wing radical. He was too moderate for the righties. Even I could go for a John Huntsman.
-- Posted by left turn on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 1:24 PM
It wasn't just to hear his drivel but to gain favor from the State Dept..
-- Posted by Old John on Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 7:50 PM
Just some long-forgotten facts about Hillary Rodham-Clinton:
Saul Alinsky was a self-proclaimed radical who advocated socialism. He was a supporter of the philosophy that the ends justify the means.
Alinsky pays homage to one particular idol, "Lest we forget, at least an over the shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all of our legends, mythology, and history ... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom." That radical was Lucifer.
Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals, "They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet."
====
Hillary was an avid follower and believer of Alinsky and met with him on several occasions. She wrote about him in her thesis and books. She worshipped the guy and turned down a job offer from him to attend Law school.
In one of her letters to the man she worshipped she said: ""Dear Saul," she began one letter. "When is that new book ['Rules for Radicals'] coming out--or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation?"
====
These are facts and are not in dispute. Hillary admits these herself. Let's see how the leftist democrats on here spin this...
-- Posted by not_sorry on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 8:47 AM
"The Clinton Foundation's finances are so messy that the nation's most influential charity watchdog put it on its "watch list" of problematic nonprofits last month.
"The Clinton family's mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.
"The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.
On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on "conferences, conventions and meetings"; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.
"In all, the group reported $84.6 million in "functional expenses" on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over -- money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.
"Some of the tens of millions in administrative costs finance more than 2,000 employees, including aid workers and health professionals around the world.
"But that's still far below the 75 percent rate of spending that nonprofit experts say a good charity should spend on its mission.
Charity Navigator, which rates nonprofits, recently refused to rate the Clinton Foundation because its "atypical business model . . . doesn't meet our criteria."
"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its "watch list," which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton's troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
-- Posted by Shapley Hunter on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 9:51 AM
Oh
-- Posted by left turn on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 11:11 AM
Rick, just to set the record straight here are my choices by preference for the dems.
1) Elizabeth Warren
2) Bernie Sanders
30 Hillary Clinton
Anyone of the 3 is a better choice than what the repubs have put up.
-- Posted by left turn on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 11:14 AM
Bernie Sanders is an Independent.
-- Posted by Old John on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 11:25 AM
It is called 'free enterprise'. Why shouldn't Bill Clinton provide a service that free individuals are willing to pay for.
Seems to me the green-eyed monster is rearing its ugly head... again. Self-proclaimed conservative hypocrisy never cease to amaze.
-- Posted by good.for.the.gander.good.for.the.goose on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 11:37 AM
OJ, I'm aware Bernie is an independent. He said he would run on the dem ticket though. A third party candidate is not going to win and he knows it. Sad but true. I guess Perot got the most of any 3rd party candidate with something like 19%.
-- Posted by left turn on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 12:10 PM
I might be wrong but, can't an employee be held accountable for unpaid payroll taxes by an employer? Don't have time to research it. Does anyone know for sure?
-- Posted by left turn on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 12:12 PM
People in general just like the clintons...and either one of the clintons are more popular than anybody that the repubs can put up against them. face the truth...repubs is a lost party who refuses to accept reality even when it hits them smack in the face.
Offer or show people some new ideas. try becoming an inclusive party. ask your daughters. they like spreading their love around.now thats deep.
-- Posted by Cadillac on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 1:50 PM
Self-proclaimed conservative hypocrisy never cease to amaze. -- Posted by Tribune on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 11:37 AM
Self evident comprehension of liberals - e.g. the difference between earning money legally and accepting bribes /payoffs for political payback - never ceases to amaze.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 4:46 PM
"Looks to me by the Hillary attacks at this stage in the game has you righties very worried. I think it is humorous that you guys all say "guilty" before the evidence is presented."
The evidence in Lefty. As usual the Clinton's have dirt on their hands.
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 9:57 PM
The Clintons are the modern day Bonnie and Clyde.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 8:15 AM
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 8:33 PM
If Hillary is elected, Will Bill's first suggestion be "Honey we need to get our people in there"?
-- Posted by Old John on Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 9:00 PM
Think the Clinton's will return and reuse the china they ripped out of the White House the last time they lived there?
"After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return."
====
Of course I could understand this. After all, Hillary said they were flat broke when the left.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 9:20 PM
I wonder if will happen to the $7million worth of books someone bought. $6.995 million worth must be in storage somewhere. :)
-- Posted by Old John on Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 9:56 PM
OJ: Think China donated half of that total to Goodwill.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 7:58 AM
Saul Alinsky was a self-proclaimed radical who advocated socialism. He was a supporter of the philosophy that the ends justify the means.
Alinsky pays homage to one particular idol, "Lest we forget, at least an over the shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all of our legends, mythology, and history ... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom." That radical was Lucifer.
Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals, "They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet."
-- Posted by Dug on Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 8:47 AM
Got a link for your information?
-- Posted by Robespierre on Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 2:48 PM
-- Posted by not_sorry on Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 5:44 PM
The best way for Hillary and Bill to serve their country would be to star in a Hill-Bill reality show to keep the liberals off the street for 30 minutes a night.
Of course speak out would lose some participation during that time slot.
-- Posted by Old John on Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 9:15 PM
I wonder if will happen to the $7million worth of books someone bought. $6.995 million worth must be in storage somewhere. :)
-- Posted by Old John on Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 9:56 PM
They are in Russia. It was part of the nuclear deal. They are using them as shims for unlevel tables.
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 10:18 PM
--Posted by Old John on Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 9:15 PM
OJ: A manufacturer of Cuban cigars and an email provider could be their sponsors.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Fri, May 1, 2015, at 8:24 AM
I am surprised that Theorist hasn't shown up to stand by and defend her man.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 8:28 AM
To get Theorist involved all you have to say is "Ronald Reagan was a good president". Then her "independence" melts down...
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 8:38 AM
I liked Bill but Hillary is no Bill.
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 8:39 AM
About 50 more if you need.
-- Posted by Dug on Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 5:44 PM
I am sure you are equally as concerned about the republicans who consorted with Alinsky, yes?
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 4:47 PM
I am not surprised a welfare recipient like Wheels is whining and crying about someone else's success. So pathetic.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:09 PM
I am sure you are equally as concerned about the republicans who consorted with Alinsky, yes? -- Posted by The Spaniard on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 4:47 PM
Which one of the are running for President?
That's what I thought - another irrelevant, unrelated, weak position.
Surely you can do better than that?
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:19 PM
Spaniard - according to Theorist definition, you are stalking me. You're hurting my feelings and should apologize.
Do liberals follow other liberals rules and sensitivity?
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:26 PM
Spaniard - according to Theorist definition, you are stalking me. You're hurting my feelings and should apologize.
Do liberals follow other liberals rules and sensitivity?
-- Posted by Dug on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:26 PM
I am not surprised your feelings are hurt.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:45 PM
No apology? Now my feelings are really hurt.
Now answer the question - which republican that was friends with Alinsky is running for president?
Your evasion speaks volumes. We're used to irrelevant and and unrelated postings from you.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:48 PM
We're used to irrelevant and and unrelated postings from you.
-- Posted by Dug on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:48 PM
But yet you respond and you let me hurt your sensitive PC feelings. Wimp.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:56 PM
Which republican candidate was friends with Alinsky?
Wimp.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:58 PM
Which republican candidate was friends with Alinsky?
Wimp.
-- Posted by Dug on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 5:58 PM
Did I say a current republican candidate consorted with Alinsky? No, I didn't. **** you are dumb. So freaking dumb.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 6:02 PM
The definition of wimp:
/wimp/ noun: wimp; plural noun: wimps
1. a person who has all their posts deleted on an anonymous forum for fear of being quoted or having to stand by their statements. Having your posts deleted twice: super wimp. See: Jay / Ike / Spaniard / L'Espagnol / The Spaniard
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 7:01 PM
Must be the full moon effect.
-- Posted by Old John on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 8:36 PM
Bill Clinton was driving past the White House when he accidentally ran over the Obama's new puppy, Sunny, crushing it flat as a fritter. He climbed out of his Rolls and sat down on the grass totally distraught. He knew Michele would go ballistic.
Then he noticed a lamp half-buried in the ground. He dug it up, brushed it off and immediately a Genie popped out. "You have freed me from thousands of years of imprisonment," said the Genie "As a reward I shall grant you one wish."
"Well," said Bill, "I have all the material things I need, but let me show you this dog I just ran over."
They walk over to the splattered remains of Sunny. "Do you think you could bring this dog back to life for me?" Bill asked. The Genie looked at the remains and shook his head. "This poor critter is too far gone for even me to bring it back to life. Maybe there's something else you'd like?"
Bill thought for a minute, reached into his pocket and pulled out two photos. "I had an affair with this beautiful young girl called Monica," said Bill, showing the genie the first photo. "But I'm actually married to this older, distressed looking woman called Hillary" and he showed the genie the second photo. "You see Hillary isn't good looking at all, so do you think you can make her look pretty like Monica?"
The Genie studied the two photographs and after a few minutes said, "Dang, man, let's go have another look at that dog!"
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 11:20 PM
Yes, I stand by statement that the US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign. The USSR would have done it without us. But you don't know that and I understand that. You're dumb. -- Posted by The Spaniard on Sat, May 2, 2015, at 6:00 PM
-Battle of the Atlantic - 18,000 Americans killed, no Russians
-Northern Africa - 10's of thousands of American's killed, no Russians
Battle for Italy - over 140,000 killed, no Russians
Battle for France, Belgium, "bulge" - nearly 200,000 killed - no Russians
Estimated 213,000 Americans killed in the European theater of WW2 fighting Hitler.
US Lend/Lease program saved Russia from defeat by Hitler - a massive gift of food, equipment, munitions to help them.
=====
"The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign" - Spaniard
Probably the dumbest thing I've ever seen posted on this site. Ever. We know, you're an atheist / communist sympathizer. Doesn't make your many, many unsubstantiated baseless claims right. Absolutely dumb.
You're cornered. Now double-down on your highly public mistake.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM
-Battle of the Atlantic - 18,000 Americans killed, no Russians
-Northern Africa - 10's of thousands of American's killed, no Russians
Battle for Italy - over 140,000 killed, no Russians
Battle for France, Belgium, "bulge" - nearly 200,000 killed - no Russians
Estimated 213,000 Americans killed in the European theater of WW2 fighting Hitler.
US Lend/Lease program saved Russia from defeat by Hitler - a massive gift of food, equipment, munitions to help them.
=====
"The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign" - Spaniard
-- Posted by Dug on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM
Dug lies again with his bogus casualty rates. The soviets lost more than any other allied power combined. But more importantly, they defeated the single greatest military force ever assembled in human history. Then they conquered Berlin. Dug doesn't know squat about the 2nd world war and his last post proves it, complete with misleading numbers and lies. This is what conservatives do: they lie, like Dug.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:37 PM
Not even close Duggy Poo. Not even close. Which is why you're BS stats above once again prove how dishonest you are...
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:41 PM
Battle for Italy - over 140,000 killed, no Russians
Battle for France, Belgium, "bulge" - nearly 200,000 killed - no Russians
Estimated 213,000 Americans killed in the European theater of WW2 fighting Hitler.
US Lend/Lease program saved Russia from defeat by Hitler - a massive gift of food, equipment, munitions to help them.
=====
"The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign" - Spaniard
-- Posted by Dug on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM
Post your source for those numbers Duggy. Bet you don't. In fact, I am so sure you won't that I will make you a bet: Post your links to support EVERY american casualty number you posted above and I will sign off and never come back. Do it.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:47 PM
The soviets lost more than any other allied power combined. -- Posted by The Spaniard on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:37 PM
So? They got slaughtered. 100% irrelevant to this dumb statement - "The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign".
Those casualty rates are absolutely correct. "Use the Google".
They conquered Berlin? And you think that "Berlin" is Gonna take more than your opinion on this forum. Want the best lie here?
"I have never reported a post" - Spaniard
"I am contacting the SE Missourian" - Spaniard
And the lend/lease program - gonna deny that one too? Come on coward - refute those numbers.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 8:09 PM
Post your source for those numbers Duggy. Bet you don't. In fact, I am so sure you won't that I will make you a bet: Post your links to support EVERY american casualty number you posted above and I will sign off and never come back. Do it.
-- Posted by The Spaniard on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:47 PM
The soviets lost more than any other allied power combined. -- Posted by The Spaniard on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:37 PM
So? They got slaughtered. 100% irrelevant to this dumb statement - "The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign".
Those casualty rates are absolutely correct. "Use the Google".
They conquered Berlin? And you think that "Berlin" is Gonna take more than your opinion on this forum. Want the best lie here?
"I have never reported a post" - Spaniard
"I am contacting the SE Missourian" - Spaniard
And the lend/lease program - gonna deny that one too? Come on coward - refute those numbers.
-- Posted by Dug on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 8:09 PM
See how blatantly DUg will LIE? All he had to do was post a source and I would sign off for good. He still won't do it. He made up or twisted whatever statistics he found and he knows it.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 9:24 AM
Post your source for those numbers Duggy. Bet you don't. In fact, I am so sure you won't that I will make you a bet: Post your links to support EVERY american casualty number you posted above and I will sign off and never come back. Do it.
-- Posted by The Spaniard on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:47 PM
Crickets...
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 9:25 AM
All he had to do was post a source and I would sign off for good. -- Posted by The Spaniard on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 9:24 AM
You won't sign off for good - you've been caught lying numerous times as evident by your own words.
You'll go away for a while when another woman enters your life and return when she dumps you. It's a pattern.
Use the Google Spaniard. Look it up yourself.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 10:30 AM
Battle for Italy - over 140,000 killed, no Russians
Estimated 213,000 Americans killed in the European theater of WW2 fighting Hitler.
US Lend/Lease program saved Russia from defeat by Hitler - a massive gift of food, equipment, munitions to help them.
=====
"The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign" - Spaniard
-- Posted by Dug on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM
Dug lies
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 4:28 PM
Use the Google Spaniard. Look it up yourself.
-- Posted by Dug on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 10:30 AM
Translation: I made it up.
No go cry to the webmaster like you did when you briefly suspended.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 5:30 PM
Ike, go out to the Veteran's Home and tell those guys out there that they didn't help defeat Germany. Come back and tell us what response they gave you(if you're able).
-- Posted by RELee on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 6:08 PM
Go worship your traitor.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 7:22 PM
Post your links to support EVERY american casualty number you posted above and I will sign off and never come back. -- Posted by The Spaniard on Sun, May 3, 2015, at 4:47 PM
I definitely won't post links now. I don't want you to go away. You're pure sport - not much competition but pure sport. Kinda the online version of shooting fish in a barrel. You've lied and been wrong so many times its fun to bait you - you bite every time.
Your problem isn't me you fool. It's you. There isn't a person here who believes this communist tripe:
"The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign" - Jay / Ike / Spaniard / L'espagnoli / The Spanaird
Goofy statements like that expose your cluelessness and ruin what little, if any, credibility you had. You've TWICE had all your posts deleted. Why Spaniard? The brave Spaniard cowering in fear of be quoted. Speaks volumes. I mean really - that's all we need to know about you. Gonna have those words deleted a 3rd time? LOL!
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 8:11 PM
He still wont back up his words. Coward.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 8:21 PM
Dug has no credibility here. He can't even defend his most basic of claims. What it must be like to be like to be such a LIAR.
-- Posted by Robespierre on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 8:25 PM
Your such a child Jay / Ike / Spaniard / L'Espagnoli / The Spaniard. Cowering from your own words:
"The US had little to do with ending Hitler's reign"
Talk about not being able to defend "his most basic of claims". Just like shooting fish in a barrel! Gonna have your posts deleted again Jay?
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 9:33 PM
You left off common
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 9:37 PM
Regret - You thinking that "Common" is another name that this dude is using? Could Common be Jay / Ike / Spaniard / etc. etc.?
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 9:46 PM
No go cry to the webmaster like you did when you briefly suspended. -- Posted by The Spaniard on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 5:30 PM
I didn't "beg" when suspended. I provided proof of a posting and was restored.
Translation: Spaniard keeps making it up.
You take this too seriously Spags. Just look at yourself. Foaming at the mouth.
Hook, line and sinker...
-- Posted by not_sorry on Sun, May 10, 2015, at 10:01 PM
Menu
More than eight years out of office and he suddenly is a hot commodity! Hmmmmm!
Replies (66)