-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 1:44 PM
You may base your opinion on anything that winds your clock.
I quit taking the Post Dispatch years ago, I got tired of their liberal trash.
And I am not inclined to discuss my opinion or anything else with you.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 1:49 PM
Wheels: Be careful the one on the "Ignore List" is trying to bait you.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 2:01 PM
-- Posted by miccheck on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 2:16 PM
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 2:17 PM
Wheels: Be careful the one on the "Ignore List" is trying to bait you.
-- Posted by semo471 on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 2:01 PM
Semo471,
Was on a lunch break.
She seems to think what she says or thinks about me matters. Not to worry, I have had people who are tons smarter try to bait me in my lifetime.
I will issue this disclaimer right now....
I will read and comment on any post I see out there as it pleases me and I stay within the guidelines of the Paper, and I will discuss it or not discuss it with whomever I choose. I am not obligated to discuss or get off Speak Out simply because another poster desires it. I am going to do my level best to not engage in the name calling no matter what another poster says or does to try and insult or intimidate me.
Does that cover it?
I do no take orders from those who are not my Superiors. So that leaves two classes out there, those that I consider equals and who would never assume to tell me what I had to do, and my inferiors.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 2:40 PM
Semo471,
Does it sound a mite silly to you that discussing my opinion would really be a serious discussion... all things considered?
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 2:55 PM
I must ask, however, if you're not going to discuss, why the heck are you here?
-- Posted by miccheck on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM
If I thought that was any of your affair, I might answer it..... and then again I might not.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 3:19 PM
-- Posted by miccheck on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 2:20 PM
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 3:34 PM
Believe that this is a free forum as long as the rules are followed and I will respond to the comments that I choose to. No amount of bullying will cause me to change my feelings on what to say or do. If that doesn't suit someone than go tattle.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 3:41 PM
-- Posted by miccheck on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 3:49 PM
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 4:00 PM
So....anyone have an opinion on the current President's leadership skills after 6 years ?
-- Posted by Disease Turtle on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 4:03 PM
Yes, but I don't want to be banned for posting it.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 4:10 PM
Semo471,
I rest my case.
-- Posted by miccheck on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 3:49 PM
Were we on trial for something?
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 4:12 PM
DT: guess Pres. pinky's only comment after the CIA blunder was ooppps.....my bad.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 4:39 PM
"btw ...the President and his Administration have no clue how or why the top CIA dude was outted during the President's surprise visit to Afghanistan ....guess how they found out this happened....yup , the news..."
Let me think now... if I remember correctly the Leftists made a big deal over an alleged outing by someone in the Bush Administration a couple of years back. Will this get the same play in the press.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 4:42 PM
DT: I google "witch hunt" and up came a photo of Nancy Pelosi. Amazing what you can find on google.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 5:11 PM
Didn't someone go to jail during the administration over that little mess? Wonder if someone goes to jail over this one, or merely gets transferred to another department out of the limelight?
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 5:12 PM
"Perhaps the honeymoon is starting to grow old even in the liberal media."
I think many are considering a divorce.
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 5:41 PM
The whole works is crooks both parties time for a good solid independent candidate that connects with the middle class and small business people and that has served in the military along with actually knowing how to manage people within his staff and departments instead of movie stars like we got now.
-- Posted by swampeastmissouri on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 6:06 PM
The next real leader will not come out of the current political insane asylum.....
-- Posted by Disease Turtle on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 6:13 PM
Unfortunetly you'll be waiting until long after hell freezes over before any so called leaders come out of anything other than the current insane asylum. Only the current insane asylum members have the power and cash to gain office. IMHO
-- Posted by FreedomFadingFast on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 6:39 PM
I was hoping more pro-Obama would share why they are so very pro....I reckon not.-- Posted by Disease Turtle on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 6:48 PM
DT: They are probably watching reruns of today's Presidential address.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Tue, May 27, 2014, at 7:24 PM
-- Posted by Bruised Potato on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 8:21 AM
BP: We already have "foreign aid" that is suppose to help in matters like this....oh well it's only our tax money, but maybe the administration is taking some money away from one of our "friendly" foreign aid partners (hope Pres. Pinky sees something on the news and takes action).
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 8:37 AM
"... more pro-Obama would share why they are so very pro...."
There are a variety of reasons why someone could be "pro-Obama."
One of the simplest is that he is the twice elected President of the United States and I want him to succeed at what is one of, if not the, hardest jobs in the world.
I have no illusions about his being "perfect" and don't know anyone who thinks he is. But I also believe he has done as good a job as possible under the current circumstances, in spite of the continuous prattle from some claiming he's "incompetent," "uninformed," "determined to ruin the nation" and so on.
I am also extremely "anti" the "anti-Obamaists." Even beyond the never-ending "Benghazi witch-hunt," there is now a chorus of claims that every problem with the VA is President Obama's fault. Was it really his "lack of 'leadership' qualities" that caused the difficulties in the VA handling their 8 million enrollees? Why are the numerous improvements in the VA overlooked?
It is very clear that today's clamor for instant gratification provides ample opportunity to be critical of everything, and if you choose to overlook causes and history, it's even easier to falsely claim "moral" high ground and tell yourself how everything would be perfect if only someone else were President.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:04 AM
"-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:04 AM"
That's a good confession! For your penance.........
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:10 AM
Common - your biggest blind spot is criminal action.
When Benghazi occurred you, and other Obama supporters, go back years/administrations to say "See, this happened under them too". You are nearly always defending this administration. What you fail to recognize is the criminal activity.
Benghazi in and of itself was not a criminal issue. The cover up and lies after it to save an election is. Why no independent counsel to investigate? Why must Eric Holder and the department of "just us" have to investigate scandals within it's own administration?
The IRS scandal is criminal. Why don't you support an independent counsel or investigation?
Obama has misled and been wrong about a lot of things especially his so-called signature health care reform. I'm more concerned about the criminal targeting of political groups and opponents and the lying/misleading of unemployment data and Benghazi to win an election.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:23 AM
"Anyone who has to see the news before they know what's going on..."
That majority of those kind of simplified claims amount to nothing less than political maneuvering, and I fault President Obama for going along with it unnecessarily, but there is unfortunately, reason for it being done.
Take for example, the question of VA "list manipulation." The President could rightfully have said, "Yes, we are aware of the problem and are working on it." Would that have satisfied his detractors? They would likely have immediately pounced on his "failure" to fix a problem instantaneously, arguing it was a national catastrophe, and he should be impeached at once. When an identified problem is not fixed "yesterday" the sky falls (or at least there are numerous people and groups that believe it to be the case.)
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:40 AM
"The cover up and lies after it..."
That still begs the question...
What do you think happened that was "covered up?"
- - - - - - -
"...to save an election..."
Do you seriously believe that on September 10th, Americans thought the entire world was 100% free of terrorists, and there would never be another attack anywhere in the world.
The tragic events at Benghazi had no discernible impact on the election. That claim is totally the figment of a republican imagination.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:48 AM
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:48 AM
Thanks for confirming my previous post. Your blind spot continues to deflect to the incident rather than the cover up. Even the liberal media says Obama lied about Benghazi several times.
He won't investigate the IRS targeting scandal and has lied about that. Covering up criminal activity is criminal. Selectively targeting americans by a president is criminal.
The member of his administration who perform the crimes get promoted or moved to better jobs.
And you support all of this?
-- Posted by not_sorry on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:03 AM
"...lied about Benghazi several times."
What were the "lies?"
"...IRS targeting scandal..."
The job of that section of the IRS is to scrutinize applications for tax exempt status. At that time there were many applications from conservative groups, so their applications were scrutinized.
Coming up with a "scheme" to prioritize their duties by searching for "key" words may have been unwise, but it was not illegal.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:09 AM
"...who perform the crimes..."
Who performed what crime?
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:10 AM
"...who perform the crimes..."
Good question.
I heard a couple of democrat owls discussing which one was to blame the other night. :)
-- Posted by Old John on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:15 AM
Obama's announcement of the ending the war sure came in at the right time. I don't thing it will cover the stink from the VA deal though.
Ever notice how timelines seem to coincide with elections?
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:25 AM
Pres. Pinky has had 6 yrs. of on the job training....to use a past quote: are you better off now then before? On a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the better, I would say my financial status would be 6 (started retirement in the last 6 yrs.)and the state of the union would be a 4.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:48 AM
"...more mistake by the current Administration..."
My point exactly. A DOD protocol type in Kabul, inadvertently includes the name on a list, and it becomes "another scandalous mistake" by the "administration" which appears to be the current code word for President Obama.
Do you believe that the President told the protocol guy to "put this name on the list?"
Per the Washington Post...
"Their names were included on a list of participants in the briefing provided by U.S. military officials to the White House press office."
"Initially, the press office raised no objection, apparently because military officials had provided the list to distribute to news organizations."
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:50 AM
"...suggesting this President did not pick his own Administration..."
I'm pointing out that probably about 98% of the people in government were not picked by this President, and that includes the DOD guy that made the mistake.
Just because he has the ultimate responsibility, does not make him personally responsible for every single action taken by the government.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 11:00 AM
"...is like watching a baby giraffe..."
Not a very effective simile, as the baby giraffe is off and successfully running with the herd within hours of birth, evading predators (such as "anti-Obamaists.")
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 11:12 AM
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 11:12 AM
"...for his own selections ?"
How many of the 2.5 million federal employees do you think President Obama "selected?"
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 11:17 AM
"Now it's preditors instead of witch hunts ?"
Sorry, I didn't believe I had to annotate the sarcasm.
"geeeezzzzi"
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 11:24 AM
-- Posted by Bruised Potato on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 10:59 AM
BP: That was just my opinion, no scientific measures.
-- Posted by Bruised Potato on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 11:24 AM
BP: If an employee screws up very important info such as the CIA chief's name in Afghan, that person needs to be fired. If the head of the VA neglects the welfare of our brave vets, than he has to be fired....that's the problem with this administration, no body takes responsibilities for their actions.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 11:35 AM
So did the Obama admin person who released this information get fired? Did Lois Lerner of the Obama administration get fired for targeting conservative groups?
The VA scandal is 5 years into the Obama administration. Want some feedback from democrat politicians?
"More and more Democrats in key 2014 races are calling for the president to get a spine, they say, and fire his Veterans Affairs secretary. And what more and more Democrats are saying privately is scathing, calling the president and his team detached, flat footed, even incompetent."
Did Obama's VA secretary get fired? I agree that Obama isn't responsible for every single crime or act of egregious incompetence. He is responsible for how he handles it. Apparently even many in his party see his inaction as incompetent.
-- Posted by not_sorry on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 12:09 PM
Did Scooter Libby get fired? NO. He had to be indicted and subsequently convicted of exposing a CIA operative. Who was his immediate superior? Oh, gee, that was Dick wasn't it? Short memory some people have D.. !!
-- Posted by left turn on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 2:19 PM
"The buck stops here." President Harry S Truman
Consider some of the issues President Truman was faced with.
Taft-Hartley veto, inflation, food prices, civil rights support, vetoed tax bills as favoring the rich, firing of MacArthur, "losing" China, a national health insurance proposal, higher minimum wage, etc...
How many second chances does that represent? How many people called him "incompetent," "lacking in leadership," etc.? And how many do so now?
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 2:48 PM
"Did Obama's VA secretary get fired?"
In case you forgot, or never knew....
General Shinseki's sole duty is not to manage waiting lists at a Phoenix facility. Try considering what has been done rather than focusing and emphasizing what is being worked on.
Recently from General Shinseki...
"In January 2009, I said that we would move quickly to get as much done as possible in whatever time we had together. Since then and with your advice and assistance, the support of Veteran service organizations, and the leadership of the President, we have achieved some significant results:
* VA's budget has grown by $50 billion, thanks to the President's leadership and unwavering commitment to Veterans;
* More than 2 million additional Veterans have enrolled in VA healthcare;
* We have opened over 60 new community-based outpatient clinics--an average of, at least, one new clinic every month for the past five years. Our total today stands at 825 CBOCs nationwide. We have also opened our first hospital in 17 years--a new, state-of-the-art facility in Las Vegas;
* In FY 2013, VA funded the construction of 15 new state cemeteries, three new state Veterans homes [Radcliff, KY; Salem, OR; and Montgomery, TN], and a 40-bed addition in Richmond, Virginia.
* We currently have 12 new homes and a total of 63 projects that are on the priority-one list for VA funding--and 105 additional projects, including 15 new homes, that have been approved for funding but are awaiting the states' matching funds.
* More than 16,800 caregivers have been trained to care for our most seriously injured post-9/11 Veterans;
* More than a million Veteran and family member students have received educational assistance and vocational training through VA;
* An average of 115,000 Veterans a year have been laid to rest in our national cemeteries--124,000 last fiscal year. Nearly 90 percent of all Veterans now have a burial option within 75 miles of home;
* Veterans' homelessness fell by 24 percent between 2010 and 2013, and we expect another reduction when this year's point-in-time count--the PIT count--is tallied up;
* Last fiscal year, 74,000 Veteran home-mortgage holders who defaulted on their home loans were kept from foreclosure and eviction because we worked out best arrangements with the appropriate financial institutions. We weren't able to save everyone, but with a variety of tools we were able to rapidly rehouse many and provide supportive services to Veterans' families. Our work here continues, and we are still focused on ending the rescue phase of homelessness in 2015;
* Finally, we fielded a new, automated claims system at all 56 VA regional offices--VBMS, Veterans Benefits Management System. We are now transitioning out of paper and into digital processing. Today, 80 percent of our inventory is already electronic, and over 214,000 claims have been completed through VBMS.
And furthermore...
"April 16, 2014 Independent 2013 Survey Shows Veterans Highly Satisfied with VA Care Higher rating than Private-Sector Hospitals on Average
WASHINGTON -- The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), an independent customer service survey, ranks the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) customer satisfaction among Veteran patients among the best in the nation and equal to or better than ratings for private sector hospitals. The 2013 ACSI report assessed satisfaction among Veterans who have recently been patients of VA's Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient and outpatient services. ACSI is the nation's only cross-industry measure of customer satisfaction, providing benchmarking between the public and private sectors.
In 2013, the overall ACSI satisfaction index for VA was 84 for inpatient care and 82 for outpatient care, which compares favorably with the U.S. hospital industry (scores of 80 and 83, respectively). Since 2004, the ACSI survey has consistently shown that Veterans give VA hospitals and clinics a higher customer satisfaction score, on average, than patients give private sector hospitals. These overall scores are based on specific feedback on customer expectations, perceived value and quality, responsiveness to customer complaints, and customer loyalty. One signature finding for 2013 is the continuing high degree of loyalty to VA among Veterans, with a score of 93 percent favorable. This score has remained high (above 90 percent) for the past ten years."
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 2:54 PM
Perhaps President Obama judges his performance on what he has done, not what republicans whine about.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 2:55 PM
"Try considering what has been done"-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 2:54 PM
Who was fired? Held accountable? In this, or the IRS, or other coverups/screwups?
=========
He had to be indicted and subsequently convicted of exposing a CIA operative. -- Posted by left turn on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 2:19 PM
You haven't a clue what you're taking about do you? From Wikipedia (and many others): "Following the disclosure, on September 16, 2003, the CIA sent a letter to the United States Department of Justice (DoJ), requesting a criminal investigation of the matter.[15] On September 29, 2003, the Department of Justice advised the CIA that it had requested an FBI investigation into the matter.[15][16]
On September 30, 2003, President Bush said that if there had been "a leak" from his administration about Plame, "I want to know who it is... and if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of."[17] Initially, the White House denied that Karl Rove, the White House Deputy Chief of Staff, and Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Chief of Staff of Vice President Dick Cheney, were involved in the leak.[18]
Attorney General John Ashcroft referred the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel, directed by Patrick Fitzgerald, who convened a grand jury"
=========
You see, when you screw up you should have an investigation into what happened. But low-info folks like yourself don't know the facts about the Valerie Plame incident do you? You will do anything to support Obama (D).
Again, lefty, what investigations, counsels, action by the Obama "justus" department, etc. have taken place? Where are the grand juries?
-- Posted by not_sorry on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 3:20 PM
I still think Plame was outed by her husband.
-- Posted by Old John on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 4:00 PM
Perhaps President Obama judges his performance on what he has done, not what republicans whine about.-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 2:55 PM
Common: The problem is that vets are dying while waiting for medical care, a new hospital with few doctors and nurses don't help the vets. BTW, if I were General Shinseki I would have left out the increase amount of vets dying and the amount of new cemeteries constructed.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 5:56 PM
"....campaign on improving the Vets health care ..."
Yes, and why do think it was not improved? What were the conditions in 2008?
* More than 2 million additional Veterans have enrolled in VA healthcare;
* We have opened over 60 new community-based outpatient clinics--an average of, at least, one new clinic every month for the past five years. Our total today stands at 825 CBOCs nationwide. We have also opened our first hospital in 17 years--a new, state-of-the-art facility in Las Vegas;
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 8:50 PM
"We have also opened our first hospital in 17 years--a new, state-of-the-art facility in Las Vegas"
Are you talking about the one planned, authorized, and started during the Bush administration?
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:04 PM
Sounds like a roll the dice in Vegas talking point.
So many people enrolling is got to be hard to cope with. Is that why 'we' are going all out to enroll more people in Obamacare?
Too many in one scenario and not enough in the other. So which is it?
-- Posted by Old John on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 9:04 PM
"...one planned, authorized, and started during the Bush administration?"
No. While it was started during the President Bush administration, it was most likely planned and authorized during the President Clinton administration.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 7:21 AM
No. While it was started during the President Bush administration, it was most likely planned and authorized during the President Clinton administration.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 7:21 AM
Common,
"Most likely"?
What a delicate way to say, I have no idea, with "facts" presented like that it would be just as accurate to say that "most likely" it was authorized and planned during the Eisenhower administration.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 8:08 AM
Guess in Pres. Pinky's administration any department head can do or not do anything and will never be held accountable. Does not the President have any (you know what) to fire someone. That's the first thing a manager learns to do but if you're a community organizer there's no one to fire.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 8:25 AM
* More than 2 million additional Veterans have enrolled in VA healthcare; -- Posted by commonsensematters on Wed, May 28, 2014, at 8:50 PM
From the guy who told us insuring 30 million more americans with taxpayer dollars wouldn't hurt the quality or quantity of our health care system.
So now to defend your president you're saying many of the reasons health care is worse in the VA is because of more patients?
Looks like you were wrong on your blistering support of Obamacare. And a lot of other people were right. This is a small picture of things to come under Obamacare. Will you make excuses then?
-- Posted by not_sorry on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 9:29 AM
"...it was authorized and planned during the Eisenhower administration."
I'd say your chances of being wrong about that are about at 99.9%.
I am aware that the DOD planning cycle is about 6 or 8 years, and that the VA uses the same system. The ground breaking was in 2006 so it stands to reason that the planning began during the Clinton administration, not the Eisenhower administration as you seem to think.
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 11:20 AM
No, but he did not "learn" about the ongoing problem of VA facility capacity from the "news." He was aware of it and General Shinseki was working on it.
The issue of phony waiting lists is a separate problem that must be corrected, and there rumors of it may have been reported that have now been confirmed by the VA IG.
A simple "yes or no" is not an accurate way to address the issue,
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 1:08 PM
"How long has he been aware?"
This President since about 1991. Other Presidents since about 1919.
You still don't recognize the difference between illegally manipulating waiting lists and the fact that there are 7 priorities of veterans and a wait time exists. And there is opportunity for the same vets to get Medicaid, Medicare or employer insurance.
For the wait time both the President and Secretary have been working on getting more and better facilities.
For the revelation of phony wait times, the facility managers should be fired and or indicted for fraud, and everyone should be rightfully mad about that. No one is excusing those that perpetrated the "book-cooking."
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 4:42 PM
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 11:20 AM
Common, has it ever crossed your mine that wheels was being sarcastic and poking fun at your previous post?
-- Posted by BonScott on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 5:23 PM
Dunno about wheels , no sarcasm here , I support and am proud of the Vets !!
-- Posted by Diseased. Turtle on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 5:26 PM
100% agree Rick...I was talking about the post where common said the new VA hospital in Las Vegas "most likely" started under Clinton.
-- Posted by BonScott on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 5:48 PM
"...has it ever crossed your min[d] that..."
wheels doesn't comprehend sarcasm, nor realize when someone is poking fun at him?
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 8:42 PM
"...7 priorities of veterans and a wait time exists."
Do you think there should be a difference in priorities between an Airman with a sore knee that served only at Scott AFB and a Marine that received multiple bullet wounds in Afganistan?
You don't think one should get priority in being treated?
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 8:50 PM
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 10:41 PM
-- Posted by We Regret To Inform U on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 10:41 PM
Regrets,
It is very clear, MSNBC is truly "sorry". About the sorriest excuse for the news as there is out there!
Actually I should not call them a news channel, but they are still "sorry" nevertheless.
-- Posted by Have Wheels Will Travel - ΑΩ on Thu, May 29, 2014, at 11:49 PM
"... MSNBC is truly "sorry".
And the point is what? If they say something in error or use unnecessary, insensitive or inappropriate terminology, should they follow the Fox lead and not apologize?
-- Posted by commonsensematters on Fri, May 30, 2014, at 6:12 AM
-- Posted by Diseased. Turtle on Fri, May 30, 2014, at 7:58 AM
DT: All the hospitals and doctors need to do is to send the vet's bills to the VA, simple as that.
-- Posted by Truth Slinger on Fri, May 30, 2014, at 9:07 AM
My oh my DK,
And from that liberal rag 'The St. Louis Post Disgrace' of all things.
Perhaps the honeymoon is starting to grow old even in the liberal media.
Replies (69)