custom ad
BusinessAugust 31, 2015

NEW YORK -- It could be easier for unions to bargain for better pay and working conditions on behalf of millions of workers at McDonald's, Burger King and other fast-food chains after a National Labor Relations Board ruling Thursday. The ruling, which came from a case involving a waste management company and its staffing company, refines the board's standard for determining when parties can be identified as employers...

Associated Press

NEW YORK -- It could be easier for unions to bargain for better pay and working conditions on behalf of millions of workers at McDonald's, Burger King and other fast-food chains after a National Labor Relations Board ruling Thursday.

The ruling, which came from a case involving a waste management company and its staffing company, refines the board's standard for determining when parties can be identified as employers.

The ruling could have implications for unions that have struggled to organize workers at many fast-food restaurants, which often are owned by big companies but run by small franchisees.

The companies have said their franchisees -- not the companies -- have control over decisions about hiring, firing or pay at locations that are run by franchisees. That has made it difficult for unions to organize workers across a restaurant chain, since it means they would have to deal with hundreds or thousands of franchisees.

The labor relations board's ruling could make it easier for unions to bargain with corporations like McDonald's on behalf of workers, instead of dealing with franchisees. In its decision, the National Labor Relations Board said Browning-Ferris Industries is a joint employer along with Leadpoint Business Services, a staffing agency that supplied Leadpoint with workers.

In evaluating whether a party would qualify as a joint employer, the board said Thursday it will consider factors such as whether the party exercised control over the terms of employment "indirectly through an intermediary, or whether it has reserved the authority to do so."

Previously, parties had to have exercised "direct operational and supervisory control" over an employee to be considered joint employers.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

Republic Services, parent company of Browning-Ferris, said the ruling overturned "30 years of settled law."

"This unnecessary change to decades-old law is legally wrong and disappointing and could have an unwarranted impact on existing business relationships across many industries," the company said in a statement.

The Service Employees International Union is leading cases before the labor relations board, alleging labor violations at McDonald's locations around the country. In those charges, which have not been heard, McDonald's Corp. is named as a joint employer.

Labor groups have argued McDonald's and others should be considered joint employers along with franchisees because they exert so much control over how franchisees run their businesses. The International Franchise Association opposed the ruling.

In its ruling Thursday, the National Labor Relations Board noted there were more than 2.8 million workers in the U.S. who were employed through temporary agencies last summer, and its previous joint employer standard has "failed to keep pace with changes in the workplace and economic circumstances."

The Teamsters Union said the board's decision would help protect millions of workers by holding employers that rely on temporary or contracted workers accountable.

"Today's decision is another step to show that companies can no longer claim they are not employers when problems arise," the Teamsters said in its statement.

Story Tags
Advertisement

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!