Why do Congress, Supreme Court observe Christmas?

To the editor:

The American Civil Liberties Union says the Constitution prohibits the observance of religious holidays by the federal government, even though every historical document written for and about our country includes the name of our God. The ACLU contends the name of God should no longer be mentioned in public school or in prayers during sporting events. The ACLU claims the display of religious symbols on government property is prohibited.

After Sept. 11, 2001, we saw such a great zeal for God. Isn't it ironic that we want his protection and blessings, but he isn't allowed in our schools or government offices?

Given the ACLU's position, why does the U.S. Supreme Court and Congress take off Christmas Day? Why hasn't the ACLU challenged the government on this point? Perhaps the ACLU is not brave enough to take on the federal government, but it's brave enough to take on a small town's decision to display a manger scene.

Since the majority of citizens believe in God, it would seem that we wouldn't have any trouble passing legislation giving each state the right to decide whether or not to include God in different aspects of our lives.

And just because we ban religion from public places doesn't mean we must ban God.

Our prayers should no longer be just for God's protection and blessings, but more importantly for his forgiveness as we ask him to restore our nation to the principles of our Found Fathers.

WILLIAM E. RINGPFIEL

Cape Girardeau