- Few Southeast students face suspension, expulsion for sexual assaults, campus paper finds (4/25/17)6
- Perryville family organizing bone-marrow drive Friday for ailing 6-year-old boy (4/26/17)
- Woman battered after smashing boyfriend's meth pipe against wall, police say (4/25/17)1
- Temptations bassist dies after Cape Girardeau show (4/26/17)2
- Event includes the first public tour of 200-year-old Elmwood Manor (4/23/17)3
- BBB warns Jackson man's online business might not be legit (4/24/17)
- Pilot House goes smoke-free (4/23/17)10
- State Supreme Court rules against congressman's mother in dog-kennel defamation case (4/27/17)1
- Strattman to step down as principal at St. Mary (4/28/17)1
- Cape couple turns their home into cozy, comfortable music venue (4/24/17)
Supreme Court will hear case on affirmative action
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide if minorities can be given a boost to get into universities, a subject still heatedly contested a quarter-century after the justices first addressed affirmative action in college admissions.
The court will tell universities how much weight, if any, they may assign to an applicant's race. At stake are race-conscious admissions policies at many public and private colleges, law schools and medical schools.
The only time the Supreme Court considered a college race case, the justices issued a split 1978 ruling that banned racial quotas but gave states little other direction.
Both sides of the affirmative action debate wanted the court to try again.
Justices will consider whether some white applicants to the University of Michigan and its law school were rejected unconstitutionally because of their race, under the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection for all under the law.
'Race still matters'
Michigan president Mary Sue Coleman said the outcome "will have a profound impact on our nation's higher education system and on our race relations broadly. ... Now is not the time to turn back the clock."
"The color of your skin determines so many important things about your life experience -- where you live, where you go to work and with whom you work. Race still matters in our society. The ideal of colorblindness does not mean we can or should be blind to that reality," she said.
Opponents contend that race-conscious policies hurt white college applicants by giving slots to less-qualified minority prospects.
"They're also unfair to minorities who are stigmatized and held to a demeaningly lower standard," said Curt Levey, a lawyer with the Washington-based Center for Individual Rights, which is representing white students in the challenge.
Levey said black enrollment initially fell when race considerations were abandoned in public colleges in California, Florida, Texas and Washington state. But he said the numbers are increasing, proof that race does not have to be a factor in admissions in the rest of the country.
The Supreme Court announced separately Monday that it would resurrect another controversial issue: whether states can punish homosexuals for having sex. The court ruled in 1986 that consenting adults have no constitutional right to private homosexual sex. Justices will reconsider that in an appeal filed by two men prosecuted under a Texas law that makes it a crime to engage in same-sex intercourse.
The court will hear arguments in the cases next year, and its decisions will be made public before July, just as some justices may be contemplating announcing retirements from the court.
'Not going to go away'
Only two of the justices who considered the 1978 affirmative action case still sit on the court -- Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice John Paul Stevens. Rehnquist, 78, is considered the most likely retirement prospect. He was not at the court Monday because of leg surgery.
"This issue is not going to go away, no matter what," said Theodore Shaw, counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, part of a consortium of groups that urged the court to review the affirmative action cases.
A divided appeals court upheld the law school's admission practices in May, saying the Constitution allows colleges and graduate schools to seek "a meaningful number" of minority students, so long as the school avoids a fixed quota system.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati has not ruled in a companion case addressing Michigan's undergraduate policy. Justices took the unusual step of taking the case anyway, without awaiting a ruling.
The last college affirmative action case at the high court involved Allan Bakke, a white man rejected for admission to a California medical school while minorities with lower test scores got in through a special program. The court on a 5-4 vote outlawed racial quotas. Justice Lewis F. Powell wrote separately that schools could still consider race, so long as they did not use quotas. Courts around the country have set contradictory rules, based in part on Powell's opinion.
"Many questions cry out for clarification," lawyers for white law school applicant Barbara Grutter told justices in a filing.
About 15 percent of the first year Michigan law students belong to racial or ethnic minorities. The Supreme Court was told that without diversity considerations, the number of minorities in a freshman class could plunge to fewer than 4 percent. Overall, more than 13 percent of Michigan's 39,000 students are black, Hispanic or American Indian.
The cases are Grutter v. Bollinger, 02-241, and Gratz v. Bollinger, 02-516.