- Cape teacher accused of assaulting student at football game (10/23/16)41
- Pedestrian killed during traffic collision on I-55 (10/23/16)9
- Scott County Sheriff Rick Walter faces challenge from criminal investigator Wes Drury (10/21/16)9
- 18-year-old killed in one-car crash Thursday morning (10/21/16)1
- One issue reveals Clinton's character (10/25/16)21
- Man arrested after dispute at school spurs brief lockdown (10/21/16)6
- One victim IDs his attacker in shooting that killed woman (10/25/16)1
- 'I feel for them' (10/20/16)1
- Hundreds turn out for VintageNOW fundraiser (10/23/16)3
- R.P. Lumber chain buys Southeast Missouri Builders Supply in Cape (10/25/16)7
Senate defies veto threat in trade-negotiations vote
WASHINGTON -- Ignoring a veto threat, the Senate voted Tuesday to give Congress greater leeway to change international trade deals deemed harmful to American industry.
"While our country's future trade policies are debatable, the right of Congress to participate actively in setting those policies is not," said Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn., a leading advocate of the proposal, which cleared on a voice vote.
The vote came as the Senate worked on legislation sought by the White House to strengthen President Bush's hand in negotiating global trade deals. No date has been set for a final vote on the broader measure.
The vote on the amendment was a setback for the White House, and aides said the administration would attempt to have the provision removed before the final bill reaches the president's desk.
The developments unfolded as lawmakers debated legislation to give Bush authority to negotiate international agreements subject only to a yes-or-no vote in Congress. Presidents have had such authority for much of the past quarter-century. But it lapsed in 1994, and the GOP-controlled Congress refused to renew it during the Clinton administration.
Bush, echoing arguments by Clinton and other former presidents, says the authority is essential as the United States enters a new round of World Trade Organization talks.
But the vote on the proposal by Dayton and Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, reflected concern among lawmakers that while international trade is a boon to the economy, it also harms the steel, textile, farm and other industries.
Craig, a member of the Senate Republican leadership, and Dayton would amend the presidential authority to give Congress the power to delete from any fast-track deal any part of the agreement that affects laws protecting U.S. industries from foreign subsidies and dumping.
But Commerce Secretary Donald Evans, in a letter Tuesday to Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said the amendment derails fast track, or trade promotion authority, "without justification." He said he would "strongly recommend to the president that he veto legislation that included this amendment."
He said the legislation already directs the president to "preserve the ability of the United States to enforce rigorously its trade laws." If Craig-Dayton passes, he said, "other countries will refuse to discuss their own sensitive subjects, unraveling the entire trade negotiation to the detriment of U.S. workers, farmers, and consumers."
The letter was also signed by Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick.
White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said the president "understands the concerns made by his cabinet members." He said the veto threat was made because the amendment "would seriously undermine the cause and the purpose of free trade."
Craig, who has rejected administration requests that he withdraw the amendment, said it would strengthen the president's negotiating hand by sending a clear message to U.S. trading partners that Congress stands behind U.S. trade remedy laws.
But at a news conference Tuesday, leaders of the business community joined senators in warning that the amendment was a "poison pill."
"It essentially emasculates trade promotion authority and renders all of our work useless," said Jerry Jasinowski, president of the National Association of Manufacturers.
Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, who last week helped work out a compromise on language sought by Democrats to increase benefits for trade-dislocated workers, said Craig-Dayton was a "bipartisan protectionist amendment" that would "destroy our ability to negotiate reductions" in trade barriers.
He said sponsors of the legislation are working on a counter proposal that would give members of Congress a greater advisory role in international negotiations without changing the fast track procedure.
Baucus and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chief sponsors of the trade bill, tried to head off another contentious issue with an amendment, adopted 98-0, to assure that foreign investors won't take unfair advantage of U.S. laws to file lawsuits. But Rep. John Kerry, D-Mass., who is preparing an amendment on the subject, said the Baucus-Grassley amendment didn't go far enough.
The trade package also provides health benefits for workers who lose their jobs because of foreign competition and extends a program giving lower tariffs for goods from the South American countries of Colombia, Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador.