- Neelys Landing man shot, killed by highway patrol trooper after traffic stop (05/01/16)43
- Cape student sues, accuses school officials of slamming her to ground multiple times (04/28/16)49
- Missouri House votes to allow concealed weapons without permits (04/28/16)8
- River Ridge Winery changes hands (05/02/16)
- Police report filed, but no charges in incident at Cape Central (04/29/16)40
- 2016 All-Missourian Boys Basketball (04/29/16)
- Statement: Man says copsí good work drove him to grow his own marijuana (05/01/16)1
- Bob Evans restaurant in Cape Girardeau among chain's 21 closings (04/26/16)9
- Senator introduces bill for I-57 that would connect Sikeston with Little Rock (04/28/16)4
- Hopper Road to close for months during construction of Veterans Drive (04/27/16)9
Judge takes step toward returning control to KC schools
KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- A ruling from a federal judge means the Kansas City school district is one step closer to regaining local control.
U.S. District Court Judge Dean Whipple ruled on Friday that the schools have made enough progress in four areas to regain local control. The schools have been operating under Whipple's control.
The four areas are racial balance, facilities, budgeting and transportation. Whipple's ruling did not, however, address the gap in academic performance between black and white students, an issue that will be considered separately.
Whipple wrote that the district has done as much as it can in those four areas to remove the lingering damage done by the racial segregation that led to the filing of the federal lawsuit in 1977.
"This is excellent," superintendent Bernard Taylor, Jr. said Saturday. "The district is clearly making progress, but we have more room to grow."
The ruling is good news for the district, at a time when it needs good news. On April 17, the state Board of Education will decide whether the district should receive partial provisional accreditation. Taylor said the ruling will help.
Whipple's order comes more than a year after a hearing on the district's status on issues not related to academic performance. At that hearing, plaintiff's attorney Arthur A. Benson II had opposed a finding that the school district deserved local control. Benson declined to comment on the ruling Saturday, saying he was still studying it.