- Plans in the works to save Esquire Theater on Broadway in Cape (2/21/18)2
- Man transitioning to woman killed herself in Cape City Jail in June; news comes from architect's pitch in Kansas (2/15/18)2
- Bell City arrest, Scott City incident highlight high-alert status following Fla. school shooting (2/20/18)4
- Cape Girardeau businessman proposes redevelopment project; seeks taxing district to fund improvements (2/17/18)16
- TJ's Burgers, Wings & Pizza expands with dining area in Fruitland (2/16/18)
- Pence gets it right in response to attack on Christian faith (2/17/18)12
- As February winds down, Chaffee looking forward to reopening of ice cream shop (2/21/18)1
- Scott City puts school on lockdown; officials say alleged threat 'not credible' (2/21/18)2
- The heart of the matter: Clinic helps patients rise above congestive heart failure (2/17/18)
- Local foodies share most romantic places (2/22/18)
Dems back down from fight with Bush over anti-terror spending
Associated Press WriterWASHINGTON (AP) -- Senate Democrats backed down Friday from a veto fight with President Bush over their $35 billion anti-terrorism plan and began preparing a smaller package more to his liking.
The turnabout came as the Senate prepared for a showdown vote on the Democrats' plan for responding to the Sept. 11 attacks. Republicans seemed certain to prevail, needing only 41 votes on the procedural motion -- a margin they had Thursday evening on two similar roll calls.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., told reporters that after that vote, Democrats would offer an alternative $20 billion package, the size Bush has demanded. Aides said it would provide more money for New York and fighting bioterrorism than the president has proposed.
Bush had insisted he would veto the $318 billion defense bill, to which the Democrats' anti-terror package was attached, if it exceeded the spending he wanted.
The development was a setback for Daschle and Democrats who believed they might succeed by attracting support from Republicans leery of voting against efforts to enhance domestic security.
They also thought the battle would help them paint Bush as not paying enough attention to going after terrorism at home.