- Jackson man to cast electoral vote for Trump; others trying to dissuade him (11/29/16)51
- Man killed by vehicle had been charged with domestic assault (11/30/16)
- Former Cape council member dies, remembered as 'wonderful public servant' (11/29/16)1
- Hotel chain president: City should regulate short-term lodging (11/27/16)16
- Woman accused in three robberies disguised herself as man (11/29/16)5
- Post-election taunts reported at Jackson schools (12/2/16)24
- Officers: Delta man dies during domestic dispute (11/28/16)1
- Business notebook: New store shows faith in Scott City district (11/28/16)
- Missouri chamber to honor Cape's John Mehner (11/30/16)6
- Men who pulled father, son from burning car near Naylor honored by highway patrol (12/1/16)
High court hears student grading case
WASHINGTON -- Allowing one student to correct another's work and call out the results to the teacher is just as much a violation of privacy as a doctor forcing patients to reveal medical test results in public, a lawyer argued to the Supreme Court Tuesday.
Revealing grades in open class is needlessly embarrassing, and violates federal law, the lawyer for an Oklahoma mother of three argued. The court is expected to decide next year whether trading papers in class, as the practice is known, violates a federal privacy law, as the woman claims.
Kristja Falvo claims classmates called her son Philip "dummy" and "stupid" because the reading-disabled child's scores were lower than his sixth-grade classmates in Owasso, Okla. She said she complained but got nowhere.
Falvo sued in 1998. She won a lower court ruling that focused on whether paper-swapping violates a 1974 law that conditioned federal aid for schools to a guarantee that "education records" will be kept private.
The Bush administration sided with the school district, and urged the high court to overturn a federal appeals court ruling that critics say could spell the end of academic honors like "student of the week," or displays of graded student art in school hallways.
The Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals misinterpreted the 1974 law, the administration argued.
Congress was concerned with preserving the privacy of final, institutional records of a school, not the results of one pop quiz, Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler argued for the government.
Many lawyers who pay close attention to the Supreme Court were stunned that the justices agreed to hear the case, and the court has taken some ribbing and worse for involving itself in what seems to many like a silly spat.