[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 65°F  
River stage: 32.4 ft. Steady
Friday, July 31, 2015

Kinder, 21 other lieutenant governors urge approval of pipeline

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder joined 21 other lieutenant governors in urging President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry to approve TransCanada Corp.'s Keystone XL Pipeline project, citing economic benefits to Missouri from the crude oil transport system from Canada through the Midwest. Opponents say the pipeline could cost Missouri consumers more at the pump and hurt drinking water.

"On behalf of Missourians who will benefit from the Keystone XL Pipeline, we urge the president to stop standing in the way of good-paying jobs for hardworking Americans," Kinder on Monday said in a news release. "It's time to build this pipeline."

Kinder's recommendation came from his meeting two weeks ago with the Republican Lieutenant Governors Association, said Kinder spokesman Jay Eastlick. Increased U.S. energy independence was cited as a reason Kinder supported the project.

The project is an extension of the original Keystone Pipeline, energy company TransCanada's 2,150-mile pipeline that transports crude oil from Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Neb., then splits into two arms -- one that goes south to Cushing, Okla., and another that is routed through Missouri to two refineries in Illinois. Deliveries of crude oil to Illinois began in summer 2010, and deliveries to Cushing began in February 2011.

The Keystone XL Pipeline Project is a proposed 1,179-mile, 36-inch-diameter crude oil pipeline that also will begin in Alberta and extend along a different route to Steele City. Future phases eventually will connect it to the Gulf Coast.

"Along with transporting crude oil from Canada, the Keystone XL Pipeline also will support the significant growth of crude oil production in the United States from producers in the Bakken region of Montana and North Dakota," according to the TransCanada website. "This pipeline will allow Canadian and American oil producers more access to the large refining markets found in the American Midwest and along the U.S. Gulf Coast."

Opponents say the pipeline will benefit the oil industry but consumers stand to lose. The transport system is a way for energy interests to become connected to the world market, instead of selling the unrefined "tar sands oil" it carries -- heavy crude oil mixed with sand, clay and bitumen -- to select domestic refineries that can process it, such as the ConocoPhillips Co. Wood River refinery in Roxana, Ill., said John Hickey, chapter director of the Missouri Sierra Club and Josh Mogerman of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Once the Midwest is competing on the world stage, area refineries will pay more and local fuel prices could rise, Mogerman said.

Eastlick said the predictions of higher prices were "speculative and focused on very short-term market conditions." There is a glut of crude oil in the Midwest because of boosted production in Canada and the upper plains states. The Keystone XL project would relieve it by redirecting those barrels to Gulf of Mexico ports and to world markets, where they would be "re-priced at higher global prices," Eastlick said.

"While that could mean higher prices for drivers in the Midwest -- who now are enjoying the lowest prices in the U.S. due to a lack of pipeline capacity -- that increase would be temporary, until the increased supply drove down world costs," Eastlick said. "Lt. Gov. Kinder believes, in the long term, anything that reduces America's dependence on foreign oil will be a boon for the U.S. economy and American consumers."

Kinder's release said "a study by the Canadian Energy Research Institute predicted Canadian oil sands would be responsible for 2,900 Missouri jobs by 2015 and $666 million in economic value to the state by 2025."

Eastlick cited statements made in other media reports by Alex Pourbaix, TransCanada's president of energy and oil pipelines, who said manufacturers associated with the project would add 8,500 jobs.

"Some of those jobs, presumably, would come from the Missouri manufacturers with whom his company has contracts," Eastlick said.

The company plans to use Missouri manufacturers for the pipeline project, Eastlick said.

Hickey said another risk of the project is potential water pollution because of a pipeline break, such as one Friday in Mayflower, Ark., that sent at least 12,000 barrels of tar sands oil through a residential community, causing the evacuation of more than 20 homes. Tar sands oil is especially corrosive and is a "fundamentally dirtier type of petroleum," he said.

Another ruptured tar sands oil pipeline in July 2010 caused a spill into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan and cleanup efforts continue. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on March 14 ordered additional dredging to remove oil deposits. The Keystone XL would cross the Missouri River.

"More Missourians get their drinking water from the Missouri River than from any other source," Hickey said.

Phone and email messages to TransCanada Corp. on Monday were not returned.



Pertinent address:

Roxana, Ill.

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

it is good to read Lt Kinder is working to help Kinder Morgan Pipeline

-- Posted by falcon2412 on Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 8:45 AM

If he is for jobs, then he should support medicaid expansion for that reason only. That way when he is the republican nominee for governor (he he) he can brag about that.

-- Posted by left turn on Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 10:03 AM

left turn: What is your proposal to pay for the medicaid expansion? or do you think it should just be another hand out from the middle class and small businesses. The Keystone Pipeline should have been approved over a year ago putting thousands of people back to work earning a real weekly pay check. I bet if it was a new entitlement program it would have been approved two years ago.

-- Posted by swampeastmissouri on Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM

swamp: You are going to send money to the feds, like it or not. So am I. I want what can to come back to Missouri and not another state. If you want your money to go to another state, then keep on opposing the medicaid expansion.

-- Posted by left turn on Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 3:07 PM

I wouldn't no more take advice from Kinder than I would the hookers he hangs out with..

-- Posted by Chickenlips on Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 3:22 PM

left turn you don't understand like so many the money all comes out of the same pot whether your in Missouri or another State it is tax payer money period and that is all tax payers nation wide it is still U.S. currency. We are in serious trouble in this country and if all of this out of control spending keeps up you will be lucky if you receive your check every month. This money does not grow on trees, well our trees are picked dried. All were doing now is printing money to try to stay afloat that is going to run out we have just about borrowed ourselves out of business so every body can have every thing adjustments must be made in these entitlements to slow down this mounting debt. Here is another point after you retire and draw social security and medicare everything you and your employer paid in during your working years is exhausted on an average after five-six years in to your retirement, so what happens then you fall back on the next generation for the remaining of your life if your still living to keep making your social security and medicare payments. The younger generation is not going to have any thing in social security or medicare because the baby boomers are retiring at 10,000 per day the largest generation to ever hit the social security program and the golden generation lived longer than what was projected years ago so therefore the younger generation wants these two programs revised so they will at least have something when they reach retirement age. I'm not just thinking about myself I'm thinking about my kids and grand kids and future generations. Today, we have have 123 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilites this is social security, medicare. Social Security was fine back when it was started but the time has come to overhaul the system so it can be preserved for future generations to come.

-- Posted by swampeastmissouri on Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 3:45 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Related subjects