- Cape student sues, accuses school officials of slamming her to ground multiple times (04/28/16)46
- Bob Evans restaurant in Cape Girardeau among chain's 21 closings (04/26/16)9
- Missouri House votes to allow concealed weapons without permits (04/28/16)8
- Police report filed, but no charges in incident at Cape Central (04/29/16)40
- Two hurt in motorcycle wreck on Interstate 55 (04/25/16)1
- Senator introduces bill for I-57 that would connect Sikeston with Little Rock (04/28/16)4
- Law firm requests information about Cape's traffic cameras (04/25/16)3
- Local lawmakers split over failed medical marijuana bill; voters may have a say (04/26/16)19
- Local company makes eco-friendly kitty litter that cuts cat-box smell (04/25/16)
- Man accused of pointing BB gun at Chaffee resident (04/26/16)2
Rams only will play one game in London
St. Louis scrapped its overseas games in 2013 and 2014
ST. LOUIS -- The St. Louis Rams are dropping plans to play home games in London in 2013 and 2014, citing a need to focus on negotiations on their lease and ease fan discontent.
The Rams said Monday that they will play the New England Patriots at Wembley Stadium on Oct. 28, but the team withdrew its commitment for home games in London the following two seasons.
"We want to grow globally, but we need to make sure we're on solid footing first here in St. Louis," said Rams chief operating officer Kevin Demoff at a news conference. "While this was something that we believe in and we continue to believe in, this was just not the right timing for the organization and for our fans."
Demoff said season ticket sales have not suffered during an impasse with the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission. But he said the decision should ease worries they might move after the 2014 season.
"I think the general perception is that if you're playing in London, you're not looking right now for an absolute solution. You're giving yourself an out," Demoff said. "We don't want that perception out there whatsoever."
The dome is owned by the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Bureau and leased to the Rams for home games. The lease agreement signed when the team moved to St. Louis in 1994 allows for periodic evaluations of whether it is among the top 25 percent of all the NFL's 31 stadiums.
The bureau and the Rams have been negotiating over improvements since at least January. Unless a deal is worked out, the Rams could break the lease and potentially leave St. Louis after the 2014 season.
"We're committed to working with the city to find a first-tier solution," Demoff said. "We have said we need our actions to speak louder than our words, and this action today should show St. Louis we care about getting this right."
The Rams said they worked closely with the NFL in deciding to drop the London games. NFL vice president of international Chris Parsons said the league was working to add another game for 2013 "in response to the growth in popularity of our sport. We hope to finalize these plans in the months ahead."
NFL owners have agreed to play regular-season games in the United Kingdom for the next five seasons, and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell repeatedly has spoken of the possibility of a full-time franchise there one day.
The NFL first played at Wembley in 2007 when the New York Giants beat the Miami Dolphins 13-10. Seven other teams have visited since then, with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers making the trip twice.
The Rams and the CVC are at odds about what needs to be done, and how much it would cost to get the 18-year-old dome that was built with taxpayer money to first-tier status.
The agreement to play "home" games in London each of the next three seasons had been met with some scorn in St. Louis since that would have provided for just seven regular-season games in St. Louis each of those seasons.
The CVC privately proposed to the Rams a $48 million plan in January that would have been publicly funded. When that was rejected, the CVC in February announced a plan for $124 million in improvements that included better amenities and a massive new scoreboard.
It would have required the Rams to pay for $64 million of the cost. Voter approval in St. Louis city and St. Louis County would have been required for the rest.
The Rams countered with a much more elaborate plan that called for a new roof with a sliding panel, replacing much of the brick exterior with a glass front and even re-routing a nearby street.
The Rams did not provide a cost estimate, but mayoral aide Jeff Rainford said the team's plan would cost about $700 million and the dome would have to be closed for renovation for up to three years, potentially costing the city $500 million in revenue.
The Rams were 2-14 last season, tied for the worst in the NFL with Indianapolis, and are 15-65 over the past five seasons.