- Two subjects of interest in 1992 homicide to take polygraph tests (1/15/17)8
- Obama shortens sentence of inmate from Cape (1/19/17)9
- Business notebook: Jackson salon owner also opens a clothing store (1/16/17)
- Area hospitals hope a box helps prevent infant deaths (1/19/17)6
- Cape SportsPlex contractor offers a look at the project (1/15/17)14
- Meat-processing plant faces $70K penalty for Clean Water Act violations (1/17/17)4
- Southeast to lose $3.5 million from state in budget cuts (1/18/17)21
- Subjects of interest in 1992 killing take polygraph tests; results not revealed (1/18/17)2
- Governor cuts $146 million, colleges take hit (1/17/17)
- Southern Bank announces merger with Capaha Bank (1/15/17)
Students: Prof charged in rampage was 'off'
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. -- Students banded together to let administrators know something wasn't quite right about professor Amy Bishop. She taught by reading straight out of the textbook, never made eye contact and liked to remind people constantly that she went to Harvard.
"We could tell something was off, that she was not like other teachers," said nursing student Caitlin Phillips, who was among those who complained to administrators at least three times a year ago that the biology professor was unsettling and ineffective in the classroom. Some students also signed a petition against Bishop.
Students said they had no reason to think she might turn violent. But after Bishop's arrest Friday on charges of shooting to death three colleagues during a faculty meeting at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the complaints add to the picture that has emerged of her as a brilliant but erratic figure.
While police have not released a motive for the shootings, colleagues said the 44-year-old neuroscientist was simmering with resentment over being denied tenure last March.
Her court-appointed lawyer, Roy W. Miller, declined to comment on the case.
Since the shooting, other disturbing behavior from Bishop has come to light.
In 1986, she killed her 18-year-old brother with a shotgun blast in Braintree, Mass., then demanded a getaway car at gunpoint from an auto dealer, authorities said. She claimed the gun went off accidentally, and she was never charged.
Current District Attorney William Keating said reports his office released this week show a "glaring" lack of communication between state and local police on the case.
Bishop and her husband were also scrutinized in 1993 after someone sent pipe bombs to a Harvard professor with whom she worked. The bombs did not go off, and no one was ever charged.
In 2002, Bishop was charged with assault, battery and disorderly conduct after a tirade at the International House of Pancakes in Peabody, Mass. Police said Bishop became incensed when she found out another mother had received the restaurant's last booster seat.
Bishop began shouting profanity and punched the woman in the head while yelling, "I am Dr. Amy Bishop!" according to the police report. She admitted to the assault in court, and the charges were dismissed six months later after she stayed out of trouble.
University president David B. Williams said Tuesday that student evaluations were one of many factors in the tenure evaluation process, but he was unaware of any student petition against Bishop.
The students who complained about Bishop said they first wrote a letter to biology department chairman Gopi K. Podila -- one of those killed in the shooting -- then met with him and finally submitted the petition that dozens of them signed. How Podila voted on Bishop's tenure application remains confidential.
Amanda Tucker, a junior majoring in nursing, had Bishop for anatomy class about a year ago and was one of the signers.
"When it came down to tests, and people asked her what was the best way to study, she'd just tell you, 'Read the book.' When the test came, there were just ridiculous questions," Tucker said. "No one even knew what she was asking."
Not everyone found her teaching problematic.
Nick Lawton, 25, took an anatomy and physiology class with Bishop last semester. He described her as funny and accommodating. "She lectured from the textbook, mostly stuck to the subject matter at hand," Lawton said. "She seemed like a nice enough professor."
Phillips, the nursing student, said she was one of five students who met with Podila in fall 2008 or early 2009 to air their concerns, but he "just sort of blew us off."
After students met privately with Podila, Phillips said, Bishop seemingly made a point in class of using some of the same phrases they had used with Podila. It was apparently her way telling the students she knew they had complained about her.
"It was like she was parroting what we had said," Phillips said.
Phillips also said Bishop seemed obsessed with Harvard, where she earned a Ph.D. in genetics in 1993.
"She loves Harvard. Everything went back to Harvard. It was, 'When I was at Harvard I got to do this thing, when I was at Harvard I got to do that,"' Phillips said. "She said, 'This is a test I would give at Harvard.' I'm not saying I'm stupid, but there's a reason I'm not at Harvard."
Dinsmoor, the writers group member, said Bishop may have come off as awkward in academic situations because she was impulsive, blunt, sometimes lacking in tact, and "a little socially clueless," but she was also bright, witty and sweet.
"She would not back down from a fight, especially if she thought she was right," he said. "I could not take it to the degree where she would open fire on people. It's uncomprehensible to me and it freaks me out."
To get a court-appointed lawyer, Bishop signed an affidavit saying neither she nor her husband has a job, any outside source of income, or savings. State records show that in her seventh year at the university, she was being paid $83,086, and her husband works with a company developing the cell incubator she devised at the school.