![]() Southeast Missouri State defenders William Castro, left, and Marvin Anderson attempt to block a PAT by Southern Illinois kicker Kyle Dougherty during the fourth quarter Saturday at Houck Stadium. (Fred Lynch) [Click to enlarge] [Order this photo] |
But the Redhawks made Southern Illinois sweat most of the way as they wrapped up the season.
The Redhawks, who never led, cut a 25-point SIU lead to 11 in the fourth quarter before the Salukis posted a 42-24 victory in front of an announced 7,527 fans at Houck Stadium. That figure included about 2,000 SIU supporters.
"We played with passion," said Southeast junior wide receiver Miles Edwards, who caught two touchdown passes and moved into a third-place tie on the school's career touchdown receptions list with 14. "We were determined."
Southeast ends the year 2-9, including a 1-7 Ohio Valley Conference record.
![]() Southeast Missouri State quarterback Matt Scheible tries for extra yards while getting tackled by Southern Illlinois defender Marty Rodgers during the first quarter Saturday at Houck Stadium. (Fred Lynch) [Click to enlarge] [Order this photo] |
That means home-field advantage for the Salukis until the national championship game as long as they keep winning.
"The main thing, we're happy to get the win," said SIU coach Dale Lennon, whose squad has won 10 straight since a season-opening 31-28 loss at Division I-A Marshall. "You have to give Southeast Missouri a lot of credit. Their record didn't look impressive, but they played everybody tough.
"It was definitely in doubt in the fourth quarter. We had to work for it all four quarters."
While Southeast battled hard throughout and made things interesting, the Redhawks had no answer for SIU's explosive offense that piled up 475 yards. The Salukis are eighth nationally in scoring.
![]() Southeast Missouri State's Miles Edwards scores a touchdown on a pass reception against Southern Illinois during the third quarter Saturday at Houck Stadium. (Fred Lynch) [Click to enlarge] [Order this photo] |
McIntosh, a transfer from Army, passed for 181 yards and a touchdown and rushed for 101 yards and three scores on 13 carries.
McIntosh repeatedly escaped trouble to either run for good yardage or hit a receiver. He was the primary reason SIU converted seven of its nine third downs.
"He was the difference," Southeast coach Tony Samuel said. "He got them out of five or six situations.
"They got us on a few big plays. We got some, but they made more. But we played with good heart."
When McIntosh wasn't burning Southeast, All-American tailback candidate Deji Karim did the honors.
Karim, third nationally in rushing with more than 1,500 yards, gained 155 yards on 16 carries and scored two touchdowns.
Southeast kept the speedy senior bottled up much of the day, but he broke loose for a 70-yard touchdown run and also scored from 10 yards out.
"That's what he does, he usually gets one of those big plays every game," Samuel said.
Southeast also had plenty of offense, with 344 yards against SIU's rugged defense. But it was a Southeast defender who made a game of things.
With a little more than nine minutes left in the fourth quarter, senior cornerback William Castro capitalized on McIntosh's only glaring mistake.
SIU was backed up deep in its territory when Castro perfectly read a short pass in the flat. He stepped in front of the intended receiver, caught the ball in stride and went untouched 14 yards into the end zone.
That play pulled Southeast within 35-24 and there still was plenty of time left.
"I had seen it on film and I saw it coming," said Castro, among 17 Southeast seniors honored before the contest. "My last game, it's a good way to go out.
"I wish we could have won, but everybody played hard. That's all you can ask."
SIU ended Southeast's upset hopes by marching 66 yards for a touchdown on its next possession.
The Salukis then forced a punt and ran out the final 5:58 by driving to Southeast's 5-yard line before taking a knee as the game ended.
"I'm very proud of our team," said junior tailback Henry Harris, who led Southeast rushers with 93 yards on 21 carries. "We knew it was a big game. We had nothing to lose. But they're No. 1 for a reason."
Southeast had several strong first-half drives but failed to score as SIU entered the locker room ahead 21-0, thanks to a pair of touchdowns in the final 3:10 of the half.
That set the stage for a back-and-forth second half that featured seven scores between the teams.
A 38-yard field goal by redshirt freshman Curtis Huge, who had a 43-yarder blocked in the first quarter, got Southeast on the board at 21-3.
Southeast got touchdowns on its next two possessions as sophomore quarterback Matt Scheible hit Edwards on a 54-yard bomb and a 5-yarder.
But SIU answered each Southeast score to lead 35-17 before Castro's interception return moved the Redhawks within striking distance.
"We hung in there and played really hard. We came back in the second half and put some points on the board," Scheible said. "But we still lost."
![[SeMissourian.com]](http://www.semissourian.com/images/nameplate.gif)




"Southeast hangs with"? "made SIU sweat"? Seriously Marty??
Down by 21 at the half and you're playing SIU's freshman? Playing a team that has already clinched the conference and the playoffs?
I agree that it's important for southeast to end the season on a positive note, but let's not go crazy. Giving up 475 yards does not get it done against any opponent.
After watching UT Martin and Austin Peays football programs surpass SEMO's, it is time to give going back to Div II serious thought. Southeast had trouble staying with SIUs third and fourth string in the game on Saturday which speaks volumes. While SEMO can be a bully to the likes of Quincy College, they have, once again this season, fallen short of even being competitive.
SEMO is not going back to D2. There's no point in going back on the progress we've already made. Yes, our sports have struggled ever since we made the jump, but it's still progress. Like I've said before, Western Kentucky's football team just moved to D1 FBS this year from D1 FCS and they haven't won a game. Do you think they should drop back down to FCS now? There's a lot of reasons why SEMO hasn't been able to have as much success, but we have to move forward and build on it, not go backwards.
I was there along the sideline. The Salukis certainly did have to sweat this one. The 21-0 score at half was misleading because SIU scored two TDs late.
It was enough of a game that SIU dropped from number one to number three.
SEMO did not look like a 2-9 team and/or SIU did not look like a 9-1 team...
dominic, what progress has Southeast really made other than keeping an open office-relation with the NCAA? You use the Western Kentucky program as your example, however, there is a major difference: they won at the FCS level and slowly made strides to move up to FBS. Southeast has not made strides to stay in FCS as exhibited by their lack of competitiveness in the OVC, upgrade of facilities, or putting money into its programs. The schools I used as examples (UTM and APSU) clearly indicate that instead of moving forward, Southeast continues to go backwards. APSU went from non scholarship several years ago and allowed football as a scholarship sport two years ago. Look at the standings, they speak volumes. It is the same thing year after year. And, yes, the ONLY logical resolution would be to either drop all sports as a cost saving measure or drop to Div II and be competitive.
profe052000 you honestly don't know what your talking about. You probably never played a down in your life. Semo was very competitive this year. If I were a recruit reading all these negative comments, that would be enough not to sign with Semo. Not being competitive in Div 2, not being competitive in Div 1, one common denominator, negative people.
I guess everyone has different definitions of what is competitive. A team can hang in each game however if they have a losing record then one could conclude the program is not competitive. Regardless of whatever level a college participates it still takes commitment and money. The cited Western Kentucky example will be interesting to watch since they recently elevated their football program to the FBS and are struggling. Jacksonville State has made noises about moving up to FBS. I recall several months ago the topic of new facilities and greater investment attracts athletes. All I can say is Oklahoma State has demonstrated improved facilities and increased investment has attracted better athletes in all sports. Former Oklahoma Football Coach Barry Switzer summed it up: "Kids don't care about legacies and who the coach is. They want things that are shiny and new." So SEMO needs to invest more in all their sport programs and when the winning starts you will see the negative comments subside. But one final shot--If they don't start investing in the programs then the time will come to make a big decision.
colshotwell makes some very valid points that we should consider. First off, to set the record straight, alum90, it is not a common denominator of negative people. Rather, it is a simple fact that in 12 years since joining div 1AA, semo has only has a winning record twice. So no need to suit up to realize that spells doom for a program. As for facilities, having to change in a former churches' rec building is not quite a step in the right direction towards facilities. Houck needs serious upgrades and has for several years. Several examples include: why is there only one scoreboard at the stadium now?; where are the fans?; where is the community spirit? Alum90, these are simply facts that cannot be overlooked. If shiny and new attracts athletes, then let's see semo start upgrading facilities and making a serious effort towards staying at FCS. My point parallels that of colshotwell, start investing or start deciding what to do.
alum90: If a recruit were judge a school or team based on comments on a blog, then maybe that coaching staff should think twice about that recruit.
Back in the days when SEMO Indians were D2, there was alot more enthusiasm and the crowds were really into the game, especially with the mascot. Now the Redhawks cannot pull a win and they have no business whatsoever playing teams like Mizzou and SIU. They should 1) go back to Division 2; and 2) Revert the mascot back to the Indians.
RE Bobby from Cairo's comment: SIU's ranking dropping from 1 to 3 has more to do with their starting quarterback's collarbone than anything SEMO did or didn't do on Saturday.
hondaprimacy...SIU didn't drop in their rank at all. Their QB McIntosh has played since october 24. Also does anyone know that he is a transfer from Army? Was Mr. Football and Gatorade player of the year in the state of Indiana. McIntosh is no slouch by any means and will be a good player for them for years to come.
Beaker...SEMO's not going back to D2, Do you want basketball and baseball back to D2? If your university wants to be division one in a certian sport then all sports have to be D1. You can't pick and choose.
FBSEMO, that is the point exactly. Beaker is not picking and choosing as you suggest, rather indicating that SEMO is not winning at the Div 1 level. Let's take all of the sports and go back to Div2 and start being more competitive.