Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 50°F  
River stage: 33.29 Rising
Friday, November 20, 2009
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (9) Share link

Swingle to prosecute Kennett Walmart case

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

KENNETT, Mo. -- The Dunklin County prosecuting attorney has stepped aside in a criminal case with racial overtones, and Cape Girardeau County Prosecuting Attorney Morley Swingle has been appointed as special prosecutor.

Swingle has been asked to prosecute Kennett resident Heather Ellis. In an incident at the Kennett Walmart in 2007, Ellis was arrested and charged with two counts of felony assault on a law enforcement officer, a count of misdemeanor peace disturbance and a count of misdemeanor resisting arrest.

A scuffle broke out in a checkout line at the store after she was accused of cutting in line.

Ellis' attorney filed a motion Nov. 2 requesting Dunklin County Prosecuting Attorney Stephen Sokoloff to recuse himself from the case.

Sokoloff was accused by Ellis' lawyers of "making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused."

On Thursday, Judge Joe Satterfield denied the request, saying there was no legal basis for it.

According to the defense motion, Sokoloff replied to a story about the case written by Michael I. Niman of Progressive Populist, a twice-monthly publication.

The article, "Felony charge for cutting in line while black in Missouri," tells Ellis' side of the story in which she claims to have been racially targeted by both Walmart employees and Kennett police officers. The story also accuses a police officer of intimidating her family with a Ku Klux Klan business card.

Sokoloff wrote a two-page letter in response to the article in which he accused Niman of having done no background research and spoke of his "disregard for objective facts and its reliance on biased and purposefully misleading statements and outright lies."

He also suggested that Niman speak with any of Ellis' three fired attorneys who withdrew following "threats from her family."

Sokoloff went on to say an officer allegedly received a split lip from a "punch thrown by the 'innocent' Ms. Ellis."

In his defense, Sokoloff said in a written statement that "over the last several months, the defendant and her supporters have made a concerted attempt, through the traditional media and the internet, to portray me as an overly aggressive and racially biased prosecutor."

"They have distorted the facts and my record to try to divert the public's attention from her conduct," Sokoloff alleged.

The prosecuting attorney also said his statements were in a private e-mail to the author of the article and were not public or intended for publication.

According to Sokoloff, the court found that the statements were properly made under the Missouri Supreme Court rules relating to pretrial publicity as it was made to correct misinformation disseminated by Ellis or others on her behalf.

Sokoloff said that after the decision he decided to recuse himself "to remove any possible basis for a claim of bias, either at trial or in any future appeal, and to refocus attention on the actual issues and facts of the case."

The trial is scheduled for 9 a.m. Nov. 18 before Satterfield.

Daily Dunklin Democrat managing editor Deana Coronado contributed to this report.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

This article is not entirely accurate. Judge Satterfield sustained the motion to disqualify Sokoloff from prosecuting the case. Just read the docket entries under Case.net. Having said that, however, I don't believe Sokoloff has any prejudice toward African Americans and would have tried the case fairly and objectively. In addition, I also believe that Swingle, a prosecutor well known in Missouri as a very competent and seasoned, will try the case fairly and objectively. Ms. Ellis may soon wish that her motion wasn't granted.

-- Posted by br549 on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 9:53 AM

Why were these charges upgraded to a Class C felonies after she refused to plea guilty?

http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C500-599...

"if such person attempts to kill or knowingly causes or attempts to cause serious physical injury to a law enforcement officer"

Under MO statutes, do you really think a busted lip and a bruised shin qualify for a Class C felony? Believe the bumped up charges were a scare tactic that back fired on the recused PA.

-- Posted by Rogue Pig with Lipstick on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 10:09 AM

This story is not entirely accurate. Sokoloff did not withdraw from being the prosecutor in this case; the defendant's motion to disqualify him was sustained by Judge Satterfield. Sokoloff is a fine prosecutor without any prejudice at all. Swingle, the special prosecutor appointed by the Court, is a very able and talented prosecutor. Ms. Ellis will soon be sorry for asking the Court to disqualify Sokoloff, I predict.

-- Posted by br549 on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 10:15 AM

no, br549, you are mistaken. Re-read the information. Satterfield sustained Sokoloff's filing to recuse himself, not the defendant's request for recusal. The judge stated there was no legal basis for the defendant's request.

-- Posted by deannacoronado on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 11:28 AM

Another victim of the free market society!!!

-- Posted by Glock_23 on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 12:59 PM

This whole damn situation is ridiculous. I still can't for the life of me figure how the cops got involved? Did it come down to management insisting Ellis go to the back of the line? Reprimanding her for 'butting' & she popped off? Did the 'victim' (I use that term very loosely), request the cops b/c Ellis 'butted'? Geez...

A plea deal should be offered. No settlement. Ellis assaulted an officer, she should be reprimanded. If she wishes to make it a civil matter than by all means she can hire her own atty. and pursue the matter, on her dime.

-- Posted by Turnip on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 1:29 PM

Turn

It looks like she made a big scene when she was asked to move to the back of the line. She was asked to leave, she wouldn't, so they had to call the police to remove her from the store. I think that is where the **** hit the fan and she became violent.

The past articles said she was a local problem child.

-- Posted by Mr. Wiffle on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 9:53 PM

I would like to say that if one line is shorter than a longer line you are in when you are at Wal-Mart or any other store, anyone with common sense will move over to the shorter line if there is no one else behind the very last person. If this is what occurred, I am guilty of this felony myself and many more can attest to this also. Somewhere in Texas

-- Posted by Shirley Mitchell on Thu, Nov 12, 2009, at 6:10 PM

Where are the surveillance tapes that should bring some of the truth to light?

Blame everything on "The Man" wait a minute who's the man, this excuse is getting old

-- Posted by 0u812 on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, at 3:56 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: