Marketplace![[SeMissourian.com]](http://www.semissourian.com/images/nameplate.gif)
RSS
Print
Email link
Respond to editor
Read comments (2)
The Washington Missourian reported that in the 90 days before July 7, the date the law took effect, 4,346 boxes of medicine containing pseudoephedrine were sold at the town's five pharmacies. In the first 90 days after, 310 boxes were sold -- a decline of nearly 93 percent -- according to statistics from the Franklin County Narcotics Enforcement Unit.
Sales at pharmacies in four nearby towns -- Eureka, Union, Owensville and Sullivan -- dropped 1.4 percent. Police say that is evidence that methamphetamine-makers who sent friends to buy pseudoephedrine to get around state and federal laws limiting how much pseudoephedrine can be legally purchased -- a practice known as "smurfing" -- are turning to other areas.
"This is phenomenal," task force commander Jason Grellner said. "It's like a pebble in a lake. The Washington experience is having an effect on smurfing throughout the entire area."
Washington sits in Franklin County, which annually ranks among the top counties in the nation in terms of methamphetamine lab crimes and seizures.
The entire state of Oregon requires pseudoephedrine-based products to be sold by prescription only, but Washington became the first town in the U.S. with its own law. Union, also in Franklin County, adopted a similar law earlier this month.
"Now, with Washington and Union pharmacies off-limits, it's easier to go smurfing in St. Louis or Jefferson counties where there are multiple outlets," Grellner said.
That neighboring towns are not only not seeing increases in sales, but are actually seeing decreases, is evidence that the majority of pills were going to meth labs, he said.
"It's all about the money," Grellner said. "We knew all along that the biggest percentage of pseudoephedrine sold was being smurfed for meth labs, but we never had the numbers to prove it. Now we do."
Opponents of the prescription-only laws say they cause an inconvenience for those who have colds and allergies, who now have to get a doctor's OK.
But Grellner and other proponents say people who need those medicines are adapting to the change.
"The people who truly need it are getting it. That shows in the Washington numbers," he said.
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please 
Although there going other places to purchass the medicine needed they will still be making the meth there. The only ones being hurt are the ones that really neede it for illness. Also the town and county will be seeing their money taken in by taxes going down to. The state needs to make stricter laws against meth users and strictly enforce them.
This is the way we do it now days, don't punish the criminals, it's not their fault, it is the way they were raised or something like that!
We punish everyone, has anyone tried to get in to see a doctor lately?
If you need Sudafed or anything like that, by the time you get to the doctor, your allergy emergency is OVER!
Punishing everyone is not the answer! Punish the abusers! Make the manufacture of or sale of Meth a CAPITAL crime, then carry out the punishment in some kind of reasonable time frame, (so we can remember what he or she did to get that death sentence).
That is the answer!