- Two men seriously hurt in crash near Fruitland (9/21/16)3
- Driver charged with manslaughter in crash that killed 2 (9/27/16)
- Perryville man arrested for alleged patronizing prostitution, harassment (9/23/16)6
- Video and evidence largely confirm trooper's claims in April traffic stop shooting (9/23/16)9
- Cape man may lose eye after shovel beating, police say (9/25/16)2
- Funeral procession of former Cape Girardeau police chief Henry H. Gerecke (9/22/16)17
- Cape man accused of attacking pregnant girlfriend (9/22/16)
- Planning, design puts renovations of H-H building into hotel on hold (9/26/16)5
- Show Me Center upgrades may allow facility to draw more elaborate shows (9/21/16)17
- Woman accused of pushing Wal-Mart employee after theft (9/27/16)
Imposing their own condemnation
To the editor:
Some decades ago, a tornado removed a bridge that crossed the Sangamon River on a county road between Cerro Gordo and Cisco in Illinois. Why should someone demand the removal of a barrier that prevents traffic from plunging into the river? Why should someone demand the removal of a warning sign? Why should someone insist that no warning or barrier ever be allowed, under penalty of law, near such an obvious source of harm? On this country road, the warnings are still in place.
The U.S. Supreme Court continues to insist upon the removal of the Ten Commandments that warn of everlasting dangers ahead. Courts insist that ignorance of the law is no excuse. Yet the courts remove the knowledge of the laws. Such abandonment of good sense gives rise to heated indignation. Nevertheless, we curse them not but say with the angels, "The Lord rebuke you."
Know henceforth that, as of March 2, all those who agree with and aid in the removal of the Ten Commandments place themselves under the anathema and censure of the Almighty. If they think their lives in this time will be bad, just wait until they step into eternity. Let them remember their own writ of condemnation: Ignorance is no excuse.
WARREN JORDAN, Patton, Mo.