Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Mostly Cloudy and Breezy ~ 26°F  
River stage: 23.46 Falling
Tuesday, Feb. 9, 2010
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (9) Share link

Time for sanctions against Iran

Sunday, September 27, 2009
By James Talent

After years of fruitless efforts to change Iranian behavior using soft diplomacy, it is time to employ serious economic sanctions to show Iran we are serious.

Let's remember that Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons is not the only issue. Iran is the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism. It has funded and armed Hezbollah and Hamas and has supplied our enemies in Iraq with improvised explosive devices that have killed and wounded American soldiers.

Recent press reports have identified weapons now flowing into and being used in Afghanistan.

The Iranian regime has brutalized its own people, including murdering demonstrators in the streets who were peacefully protesting a sham election.

Iran's leaders have revealed themselves to be brutal tyrants set on using violence and terror to control their own people and neighboring countries. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly denied the Holocaust and vowed to wipe Israel off the map.

U.S. intelligence agencies have uncovered documentary evidence that Iran has not just a uranium-enrichment program, but the sort of high explosives-testing program necessary to develop a nuclear weapon, a surprisingly advanced ballistic missile program and a program to develop a re-entry vehicle with military nuclear applications.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has recently found that Iran has installed more than 8,000 centrifuges to refine its low-enriched uranium into weapons-grade material.

It is in this context that we should view the Iranian quest for nuclear weapons. A regime with no qualms about arming terrorists to kill Americans, Iraqis and Israelis is not a regime the world can allow to become a nuclear power.

President Ahmadinejad spoke before the United Nations last week -- the same U.N. that has passed Security Council Resolution 1696, which requires the immediate suspension of all enrichment-related activities by Iran and strict monitoring by the IAEA. After rejecting every U.N., IAEA, European and U.S. effort to convince Iran to stop enriching uranium, Ahmadinejad's very presence in the General Assembly was a shameful mockery of serious diplomacy. No doubt his words to that body removed all doubt. Iran will never stop developing weapons of mass destruction without serious action by the international community.

At a minimum, the U.S. should engage in strong economic sanctions against foreign companies that transport, finance, broker or in any way facilitate the export of refined petroleum products, including gasoline and diesel fuel, to Iran. Although it has massive oil reserves, Iran has weak refining capabilities, so these sanctions would both embarrass and hurt the Ahmadinejad regime. If there is any doubt of this, ask yourself why anti-American Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez recently traveled to Iran to publicly assure Ahmadinejad he would supply gasoline in the event of these U.S. sanctions. Ahmadinejad knows that he is vulnerable and that these sanctions would hurt him badly.

It is time to show the Iranian regime that we are serious and to give our diplomats something more tangible to work with.

Iran's days as the leading exporter of terrorism and the weapons that kill American soldiers must come to an end. But as of now, Ahmadinejad has no reason to believe we are serious about stopping him. It's time to take serious steps to demonstrate to him that he is wrong.

James Talent represented Missouri in the U.S. Senate from 2002 to 2007 and in U.S. House of Representatives from 1993 to 2001. He is a distinguished fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Talent,

I'm no fan of Iran's government, but aren't you stretching the truth?

-- Posted by James Nall on Sun, Sep 27, 2009, at 8:15 AM

Didn't that same intellegence agency just state a couple of years ago that Iran's nuclear enrichment programs had been stopped?

Sanctions worked so well against Iraq didn't they? They prevented the poorest of citizens from receiving essentials, while the ruling elite carried on buisness as usual. These sanctions accomplished nothing but providing recruits for al-Queda, and other terrorist organizations in the form of blowback against this country.

Why shouldn't Iran have nuclear weapons? They are a sovreign nation. The nations that have such weapons are less prone to bullying by the United States.

I am much, much, MUCH more frightened of the government of the United States of America, than I am of the government of Iran.

In the words of George McGovern - I am also sick of old men in back rooms dreaming up wars in foreign countries for young men to die in.

Do we want another 9/11? Is that the goal of this asinine foreign policy?

-- Posted by lumpy on Sun, Sep 27, 2009, at 8:32 AM

I think we the people ought to start out with sanctions against our OWN government for their continued infringement of the inalienable Rights of the American people, as well as the overstepping of the powers enumerated to the federal government by our Constitution.

-- Posted by dixietrucker on Sun, Sep 27, 2009, at 10:05 AM

Mr. Talent,

Which nation funded the start up of Hamas and are you calling for sanctions against that nation? Israel wanted an alternative to the PLO.

Killing of demonstrators. Remember Kent State?

The International Atomic Energy Agency has found no evidence that Iran is developing weapons grade uranium. Iran's signature as a member of the IAEA permits them the use of nuclear energy.

Barack "Dick Cheney" Obama knew about the second enrichment plant for sometime. The IAEA was notified and approved a second plant for uranium enrichment by Iran 18 months earlier. Iran has asked the IAEA to supervise the plant.

-- Posted by James Nall on Sun, Sep 27, 2009, at 11:43 AM

This is a job for the United Nations. Start by insisting on inspection of the Qom enrichment facility.

-- Posted by TheCamp on Sun, Sep 27, 2009, at 11:55 AM

Apply the same game plan to Iran that they apply to the USA.

-- Posted by voyager on Sun, Sep 27, 2009, at 12:01 PM

voyager,

The IAEA does not inspect nuclear facilities in the US.

Hillary Clinton claims that Iran cannot prove that their enrichment process is for peaceful aims. Seems that the proving of non-peaceful aims would have to be on the US' shoulders. Iran seems to be following the rules set forth by the IAEA.

After the October meeting of the 6 powers and Iran, the IAEA may see pressure put on them to change their report.

-- Posted by James Nall on Sun, Sep 27, 2009, at 2:00 PM

Well, Iraq is winding down . . .and the intelligence community hasn't made a really BAD mistake in a few years . . .and Iran has shown itself to respond really well to bullying. . .

If you have a country that has the potential to create nuclear weapons . . .it would seem to me to be counter productive to make them feel like they NEED nuclear weapons to protect their soverignty.

I would prefer that before we go off on another foray into the politics of the Middle East that we have some idea what the heck we are doing, for a change.

-- Posted by one4kids on Mon, Sep 28, 2009, at 7:45 AM

No worries folks, the minute Israel believes Iran is within a year of obtaining a nuclear weapon they will make sure Iran is never capable of completing it. Israel is far more capable of destroying Iran than

we will ever be! Frankly I hope Israel deals with them very soon.

-- Posted by GREYWOLF on Mon, Sep 28, 2009, at 12:11 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: